For me though the 'income inequality' question adds little insight into meaningful problems. Consider what it would be like if you wrote equally valid copy about 'house price inequality.' You might right, "Why is it that a four bedroom 2000 square foot ranch style house is worth $170,000 in Minnesota but worth $1,500,000 in California?" You could write about how badly the $170,000 house felt about themselves that for providing the same number of bedrooms, the same quality of shelter, and the all the same appliances as the house in California but for some clearly bogus reasons people "judged" that house to be worth less. Alas the unfairness of it all.
Fortunately we're not trying to sway the vote of that $170,000 house or its shopping habits, or you would get that sort of writing.
When you look at it in that context when there isn't a person whose "value" is being equated to their "salary" (which is the central issue in this narrative in my opinion) you can see there are so many different things going on that it makes no sense to think that houses in different places would, by virtue of their similar feature, somehow demand the same sales price.
[1] http://www.mtu.edu/engineering/outreach/welcome/salary/ not a wonderful reference but the census.gov site was letting me down.
My income is closer to the 90th percentile than the 75th or 95th.
According to [2] compared to international income distributions (rather than just my country) my income places me in the richest 0.5% of the world's population.
Needless to say, I try to stay appreciative; my position is heavily dependent on luck. I also donate around £10,000 a year to charity; seems like the least I can do really.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_in_the_United_Kingdom
[2] http://www.givingwhatwecan.org/get-involved/how-rich-am-i
Have to echo zafka's sentiment: I'm incredibly lucky to be in my position, and try to remind myself often that it can vanish just as quickly as it came. I'm fortunate because of luck and preparation (more former than latter), and it ruffles my feathers when people on HN try to toss around the "self made man" thing.
The key thing is I am only as happy, if not less so than I was when we started up. There's no excitement now, an important factor for me day to day. Also, it sounds played out, but I have more financial stress now. I have a big mortgage on a big house and employees to worry about. It really can be more money more problems.
By the time you take solicitors fees, stamp duty, etc in to account I may as well buy it for the long term. My house is already estimated to be worth 50k more than I paid for it less than 9 months ago. Why? I've fixed lots of easy problems with it, slightly modernised and I got a good deal as they were desperate for a sale, I had no chain and they needed the money (previous deal collapsed and they were on a bridging loan). I don't view it as an investment. I simply bought the house I wanted to live in, in the area I wanted to live in at a very competitive price.
It obviously comes with lots of caveats and tells you nothing about the quality of life in a particular country. It's still quite eye-opening though.
Where are you on the global pay scale? (March 2012) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17543356
I think they're presenting average pre-tax income. Singapore tax is between 0% and 20%, and there's 7% VAT. In Germany you're going to be paying between 42 and 45% income tax, and 19% VAT. That means in Singapore you can spend 74.4% of your income on what you want, in Germany 39%. And singapore is much less regulated than Germany, and much better connected trade-wise, which means goods are a lot cheaper there to begin with (not real estate though).
So, for the same bruto pay you'd have double the money in Singapore compared to Germany, meaning those Singaporeans can easily buy 4 or 5 ipads for that average wage, whereas an average Earning german would be doing very well to get 2.5 for their "higher" pay. Hell, the average Singaporean is probably better off than the average Luxembourgian.
Keep in mind that the "average" wage in singapore might be high, but the mean wage is a LOT lower. Same, of course, is true in Luxembourg, but I don't think it's that skewed in Germany.
I make between minimum wage and the average programmer's salary on my home country (which is a little above the average for senior developers but almost nothing for junior ones), without using my native language at all, and my average week is usually more than 40 hours.
I have to be available on sundays and pretty much every holiday, but at least I don't have any reason to hate mondays and I don't have to commute either :-)
Also, I get to travel a lot because I can work from almost anywhere in the world (I've lived in 2 different countries last year and visited many others), although it brings me down a little having most of my human interaction reduced to emails and online posts (Plus, when my girlfriend is not around, I have to talk to my cat to keep my vocal cords in shape. Seriously, it's quite difficult to just start talking when you remain silent for most of the day :-))
Besides, even if you arrived at some reasonable aggregate, you would then have to surmount the pitfalls of ecological inference to be able to draw any meaningful conclusions: it could very well be that users whose preferences influence the most the content of top-voted submissions are far from representative.
That is not to say though your guess is ex ante incorrect: programmers almost invariably earn above the median income in every country, especially in the US (and especially in the startup scene); and this is an English-based US site that distinctly up-votes programming and startup content --"niche" topics of very narrow interest to all but a particular sliver of population, and so highly informative in the "Bayesian surprise" sense.
There are lots to consider when trying to gauge your income to the median. Median for your city or state could be very different than your country's median income. You also have to take individual, family, and household income into consideration. There are many other factors, too. Age, occupation/industry, and educational background are all heavily correlated to income.
It makes me incredibly thankful for the sacrifices my parents made in hardship and poverty in order to provide me and my sister with an education.
My current income is well over 14 times what the median income for my age-group was 4 years go. No, I'm not filthy rich, I just live in a country whose population is largely on the poor side. If you're curious, it's South Africa:
https://www.statssa.gov.za/Publications/P02112/P021122010.pd...
EDIT: I just typed 'median income switzerland' in google and damn, I am even worse off than I thought...
For reference here are some info sources.
Countries by average wage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_average_wa...
Median household income: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Median_household_income
As it is, yes, I am above my country's mean and median (Canada), but I'm not sure I want to tell you what the scaling factor is in a public forum. (FWIW, I'm above the median and mean for the number one countries in each respective list posted by jamilv - but again, I ain't sayin' by how much.)
On this income we are able to afford to live in a nice suburb outside Boston. I am really worried about having a kid towards the end of the year though. Daycare in this area costs about $20k per year.
OTOH, we own our house outright and don't have any crazy expensive habits or any debts, so I still currently save over 50% of my net income.
I find myself guilty at my profligate unbudgeted ways but even so, I can't see how that's doable!
Tell me more
Personally I budget and save for big expenses like insurances, new car and holiday's. When you are forward planning like this you end up saving a lot of your income for those once a year items.
The person you are replying to probably isn't investing all of that 10k, but he's putting it into a saving account on a regular basis knowing that in month 7 he'll be paying out 500. The interest and habit of saving probably means that a big chunk is going on long term savings.
It's not as tough as it sounds once there's no rent or mortgage. You can count your mortgage as savings for budgeting purposes though.
I work from home, so no travel expenses. My bills and council tax come to about 300 a month. About 300 a month for food. 300 a month spending money. That's 900 total and save the rest.
Note that I'm below the median for two people, which is a little higher than the median for one, but it's still in the same ballpark.
Then you probably do, no?