I personally delineate between politically-charged statements that are designed to promote clear thinking and those that are designed to sow muddled thinking through clever semantic games or misplaced emotion.
Not to say I'm above doing the same thing, but it's nothing special. :)
In any case, passing by pointers is more time efficient than argument copying.
Reasonable people can (and do) disagree on the net impact of minimum wage laws when considering it as a thought exercise.
Again, I'm not bashing you for this. But the idea that someone with the same political leaning as you comes up and says, "Yes! This person says what I believe succinctly, therefore HN is greater than other sites!!!!1!" is not sound.