Linus Torvalds gives a tour of his home office
youtube.com
youtube.com
[1] http://www.lut.fi/documents/10633/139156/opiskelu-tohtoriohj...
That is not a guy who's comfortable on camera.
-uses the web browser for email
-uses standing desk with treadmill
-old desk is very dirty
-doesn't like light in his roomMaybe the desk will get rid of that though
- wears sandals with socksPff. Socks in sandals is basically considered a fashion-sin by most people. But I can only speak for my part of Europe.
I still wish it was dual-bootbable.
i would be careful. there could be cameras in there.
http://i.imgur.com/FFE1ysu.png
Perhaps it lets him stay focused. He also doesn't use a debugger if I remember correctly.
Ctrl+arrow all the way.
I don't have any extra displays. When I was little, I'd read Adam Engst talk about how great a second monitor was and lust after one, but never could bring myself to buy one. When I went to work for Condé Nast they gave us all nice big external Dell monitors and I found that I just couldn't get in the habit of using two screens. Everyone talks about how great it is to have more screen real estate, but apparently for what I do it doesn't really matter. I spend nearly all of my time on the computer staring at a block of text of one sort or another (emails, web pages, code) and no matter how big my screen is, I can't read more than a couple words at a time. Everything else on the screen is mostly a distraction. But maybe I'd feel differently if I wasn't so nearsighted.
I've found working on just my 15" laptop leads to much less procrastination (sometimes).
As far as coding goes, living in a monastery with a laggy internet connection, using a slow netbook with 11" screen was one of my most productive times.
That's one of the most amazing things I have heard in a while.
Don't give my boss any ideas. ;)
I recently had the brilliant idea to try three monitors, figuring that if two are good then three would be better. This only lasted about a week, though. I found it just to be way too much mouse movement (yes, I use a mouse, get over it!) going all the way from monitor #1 to monitor #3.
So my observation is that monitors are like martinis, one isn't enough and three is too many.
I do wonder if it's just the aspect ratio of the desktop area though. I feel like if I had two landscape monitors on top of one another, and one portrait to the side, that would be more manageable.
(The horizontal arrangement of monitors is more common, but actually I think the vertical one is much better. I currently have my laptop sat under my main monitor, and it works very well. With a horizontal arrangement I've always found myself ending up with a preferred monitor straight ahead and spare less-used one(s) to this side. After all, who wants to keep having to turn their neck? But with them stacked on top of one another, all you need do is glance up and down, and they're all equally useful.)
At least in my case, my screens are usually very centered and I sit far back enough that I never turn my head. shrug
I have three 24 inch monitors connected to my desktop computer.
The middle one is where I do 99% of my work.
The left one is where I usually have a YouTube or Netflix video up distracting me.
The right one is where I drag a window over for 20 seconds while I rearrange stuff. Most of the time it's 100% empty.
My brain is certainly a single-core processor.
TL,DR: One is surprisingly sufficient.