The American Poker Frat of Playa del Carmen
slate.com
slate.com
Nothing quite like being faced with a massive raise and then your opponent fumbles their chips or something and now you know your deuces are good.
Only in live poker do you get such sustained experience reading people and attempting to influence their behaviour - much more exhilarating than making statistically correct decisions across a terminal!
As poker gets tougher, win rates decrease and a really strong player's expected yearly winnings might be reduced to 100k a year without any real applicable real-world connections or skills. 5 years from now, with the game losing popularity, that expectation might be 50k.
Whereas, if the player had entered the real world, their expected career earnings would increase over time. It'd be hard for me to recommend poker as a career to anyone with the state of today's games. 4 or 5 years ago, it would have been tough for me to convince someone otherwise - especially with the freedom it afforded.
The two most popularly used are: http://www.holdemmanager.com/ https://www.pokertracker.com/
There is a lot more to winning than just owning a HUD, it takes a lot of skill to manipulate statistics properly to observe weaknesses in your opponents.
This is not allowed by the sites and there have been some notable scandals of nose bleed-players sharing hand histories to explicitly target another player.
http://www.pokernews.com/news/2009/12/the-4-million-controve...