Hacker News Reader

Comment by acangiano | Hacker News Reader

Assuming it's effective, this guy deserves the Nobel prize.

The Nobel prize is usually awarded for basic science, uncovering the mechanisms of something, rather than engineering applications based on that science.

Engineers always have the option to settle for a boatload of money.

From the article, it sounds like he already had this prior to working on the invention.

That changes over time. Nobel's intention was to give it to people that gave the greatest benefit to mankind during the year. A few prices in the later years have been directed toward less base-research like inventions.

Also... why do people keep refering to the "The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel" as a nobel prize in economics? It's not one of the subjects that Nobel himself thought worthy.

I'd like to see how they apply this 'basic science' rule for the Peace Prize.

They don't, (nor do they for Literature, of course), and often the Peace Prize is used as a political platform for the Nobel Committee. E.g. Al Gore.

I was joking, but thanks for asking anyway.

Indeed, if you look at the very earliest Nobel prizes they were less focused on basic research. For example, the 1909 Physics prize to Marconi/Braun "in recognition of their contributions to the development of wireless telegraphy" or the 1912 Physics prize to Gustaf Dalen "for his invention of automatic regulators for use in conjunction with gas accumulators for illuminating lighthouses and buoys".

A Nobel Prize wasn't even given for the first heart transplant.

True.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com