Heck, I understand we all want to see when we want because we have better things to do now or not enough time. Regardless, I don't think we should ruin from starters their commercial project.
I mean, it's not even a DRM. Just a weak misleading protection layer from Vimeo for deterring little noobs that don't know how to use their browser's debug console.
Let's give the creators some advantage before gaming the system.
Also, if someone genuinely can't afford the price, they can still enjoy the video. That seems like a net win for society.
But... I see no point into publishing the direct stream link. Although it's funny due what the movie is about, I think it creates some disadvantages for them.
I hope they took in mind this and they don't feel threatened by this behavior.
No matter how long, more "leechers" are going to abuse the system instead of a few "geeks" with the knowledge.
Sure, if the timespan is short, almost no damages will be taken. Unless it gets distributed through other networks. If they didn't expected this, they may be upset.
Hey, even maybe this was the main purpose, to go viral. Who knows. I just wanted to share how I felt to see the stream link published.
I did it through FlshGot. This is no science. It's just a rightclick.
This is not some hidden elite treasure you need to hide here.
I do: now I can watch the movie on my TV instead of my computer screen. With my current setup, having a naked mp4 file is the only way for me to easily do this.
I'm hoping that the movie gets better, but so far it's espousing the teenage-wannabe-god version of being a hacker.
surely information wants to be free? :-)
That's why small producers' crowdfundings tend to work, because we appreciate the effort.
Information wants to be free. True. It doesn't mean free-for-all.
A little note aside the link saying: "hey, wouldn't be great to donate to them if we like it" would be fairer than just simply pasting the link.