LibreSSL is an OpenSSL fork done by the OpenBSD team primarily because they don't think OpenSSL is the right software to include in their OS. That's their decision, if you don't use OpenBSD, you don't have to care. They have done an insane amout of work in pretty short time, and since that work might benefit the larger OS community, they kindly decided to start work on a portable version, which you don't have to use.
Even if you don't use LibreSSL, you might still benefit from their work as there is a healthy collaboration between OpenBSD/LibreSSL and Google/Adam Langley/BoringSSL.
Now, there's a first preview release of portable LibreSSL, and nitpicks are used to demonstrate how supposedly incapable the OpenBSD team must be. They hardcode -Werror, they obviously don't know how to write a configure script. They don't provide a PGP signature for the preview release, they obviously don't know how to distribute software securely. They use Comic Sans, they can't be taken seriously at all.
If you think LibreSSL will benefit you personally, you might consider showing a little gratitude. If you don't think LibreSSL is of any use to you, why do you even bother to write about it?