Men born between 1893 and 1897 reminded to register for the draft
washingtonpost.com
washingtonpost.com
I know the National Organization of Women's position has always been that they oppose any kind of draft, but if it has to continue they would like women to be included. I think most feminists would understandably rather work to get rid of all selective service rather than include women.
No this is a human error. Are they trying to avoid responsibility when this is a minor (and a little funny) mistake ?
"Screw that batch processing job. I wanna get to 2048!"
Anything else in software is a programming error, but not necessarily a programmer error, since it might start with wrong HW specs, compiler bugs, etc.
To me it looks like a Y2K bug.
".. the agency uses a two-digit code for the birth year, which is why the years 1893 to 1897 were mixed up with the years from 1993 to 1997."
Sorry couldn't help myself.
As an aside: Do the SS send letters to dead people born between 1993-1997? You'd assume they'd check for death records or have some way of being notified about that.
For example if a boy is born in 1993 but died at age 5, do the parents get a letter from the SS in 2011 telling the boy to register for the SS?
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_Stat...
I find that surprising, I would expect even newcomer professionals to at least have heard about the Y2K bug.
My estimate is we will see this blow up again in 2018.
The letter shown in the example was sent to someone who died in 1992 so there's at least some evidence to suggest that floating around is not a necessary condition to receive the letter.
The program tidied it to 01/12/14 (I'm in the UK, presumably the field order is locale-dependent) then exported a CSV with the default settings. Voilia, I have a file with the date expressed as 01/12/14
My guess is this process only gets run once a year, so it's not been a high priority for automation, and someone's spreadsheet program is configured to work out two-digit years automatically.