No. That way, when you have a crash and are severely injured, you'll realise that you should have been wearing a seatbelt!
No. That way, when you have a crash and are severely injured, you'll realise that you should have been wearing a seatbelt!
i know for a fact that youtube for example did not touch version control early on. you should definitely appreciate speed when you're starting because your ideas could change (and your code).
it's a trade off, and eventually you'll start doing stuff like unit testing. at some point, the more time you spend perfecting your code, the less time you can spend prototyping and changing the idea if it needs to be changed. i don't think it's comparable to a "wear your seatbelt, you should ALWAYS be using version control in EVERY situation" thing, you should really think about whether you need it. you should worry about hard disk failures, so do a back up every once in a while with a flash drive or dropbox at the very least. but version control has its own learning curve.
I would guess most people on their second startups enable version-control from the beginning.
With version control you're always safe in the knowledge that whatever you do, you can always 'revert' to the last version that worked.
Irony is judged by how artfully it approaches the line of apparent total sincerity without going over. Your response is clearly ironic. But it's possible to imagine, for a few seconds during the first reading, that the OP is being serious. Only after you think about what he just said do you start laughing.
Guh, reminds me of what my friend used to do. He'd be acting all excited and say "Did you hear? Nine Inch Nails is having a concert here next month!" and I'd be like "Wow, cool, I want to go!" and then he'd crack up laughing and say "I can't believe you thought I was serious".
edit: he didn't deserve to be downvoted .. wtf. Maybe downvoting should cost the downvoter a point too, like on Stack Overflow. Would be an interesting experiment.