I think the point Carl Banks was trying to make is that Lisp programmers don't trust standard functions - not that there aren't standard functions to do the job.
Even embedded systems hackers have libraries and API that they port to and tweak for every new architecture and configuration they're faced with.
Your statement about Lisp programmers not trusting standard functions, or at leas your interpretation of Carl's (I didn't read it that way, btw.) is patently untrue.