D-day landings scenes in 1944 and now – interactive
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
This sort of interactive image thing is really cool and helps engage users with the content far more than just side-by-side images.
edit: What always fascinates me about these sorts of pictures is the degree with which the old buildings are all still there. Coming from Australia, very little of our stuff tends to be 'old' and 200 years is just about the upper limit. It's just so foreign and abstract to me that it's always a little offputting and noticable.
[1]: http://www.abc.net.au/news/specials/hurricane-sandy-before-a...
Yeah, I can envision that.
America has something related, and related to your feeling about it that "you can truly change the world and accomplish anything you want". We're a land of natural disasters, but very very few of them are as severe and encompassing as the geological events in Iceland. So our disasters tend to invoke a response from the survivors to pick themselves up and rebuild. I had a "better" than front side seat to this starting in 2011: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Joplin_tornado
In Berlin, for example, a lot of the damage of the fights on the museum island visible or repair is very obvious.
This post has 2 good examples: http://planet2.de/netzlog/?p=2093 (Text is rather uninteresting)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2219584/Ghosts-war-A...
http://www.mymodernmet.com/profiles/blogs/the-ghosts-of-worl...
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/images-world-war-devasta...
http://www.businessinsider.com.au/europe-overlay-photos-2014...
http://petapixel.com/2013/04/02/photos-of-modern-day-locatio...
img {
max-height: 100vh;
width: auto!important;
}