In Japan, Idled Electronics Factories Find New Life in Farming
online.wsj.com
online.wsj.com
What is the plan to deal with the obvious consequence of removing this built-in subsidy on a huge number of people who have no other skill than farming? It would need to be replaced with something explicit.
I don't argue against technological progress simply because it would make old jobs obsolete. But in this situation the consequences are fairly predictable, so why not make a plan for it instead of throwing the elderly family farmers of Japan to the wolves of the free market?
You'll find that the highest priced versions of a food are those produced domestically, beef being a prime example.
A great deal of the vegetables are also grown on small farms here. I think the quality and taste are much better for it, but prices are very high for even simple things.
My rough estimates put the cost of JPY50k/month to the adult population at somewhere around USD 700 billion/year and JPY170k/month at USD2,400 billion, or around 47% of Japan's GDP. Total social security spending is currently in the order of USD300 billion.
Given that the Japan Government currently spends (excluding interest costs) around USD230 billion more than it earns in revenue each year, such a proposal would be extremely difficult to implement.
For reference, in 2014 the Japan Government has:
- Outstanding debt of ~USD12,100 billion
- Annual revenue of ~USD691 billion
- Annual spending of ~USD921 billion.
But, let me try it with figures from 2011.[1]
107,495 billion JPY for total social welfare 32,463 billion JPY for national health insurance
The author deducted the amount spent for national health insurance from total social welfare.
That leaves: 75, 032 billion JPY
It should only be for the adult population, but I can't find numbers for just adults, so I divided by 120million.
625,266 JPY annually or 52105.5 JPY a month.
IIRC social insurance is not included in the general budget.
As far as the 170k JPY calculation, that was just my imagining what would be a reasonable basic income. I have never crunched the numbers on it.
But, it comes out to 2.04 million yen a year. Since the GDP per capita in Japan is 3.76 million JPY, this would be quite the redistribution of wealth.
Indeed, the social insurance premiums/expenditures are not included in govt. revenue/expenditure figures, thus the disconnect.
It's worth noting that ~25% (JPY29,040 billion - JPY20k per month per capita) of the funding for those programs comes from employer contributions for their employees.
Japan's unemployment rate is only 3.9%. EU's rate is 10.9% and US' is 6.1%.
And Japan's social welfare means mostly pension and national health insurance. There's unemployment insurance, but you have to pay into it. Very few working-age, able-bodied people receive "free" welfare benefits.
Why not look at the population as a whole, determine the number of people 18-65 (or whatever retirement age is) who are working versus those not working. You can knock out percentages based on students, severely disabled, and such.
Also, Japanese food prices are kept artifically high by a cozy subsidy racket run by semi-governmental coop union JA ($5 for a kilo of rice, anyone?) but that's another story.
I'm sure these converted clean rooms are excellent at negating microbial and particulate contamination, though I have to wonder how much concern has been given to negating chemical contamination, given the purpose these facilities previously served.
[1] http://www.viridisaquaponics.com/#about
Edit: I take it back, the WSJ does mention the Low-K angle, I just missed it on my first reading.
It has little to do with food security.
https://sites.google.com/site/radioactivityinbasel/radioacti...
So ongoing radiation would not be expected to cause major concerns with Fujitsu's relatively removed work. Residual radiation and contamination of the soil used could pose problems, but I do not think they will. Given how low they have gotten the potassium levels, I expect that control over the growing environment and soil will is quite high.
Probably no. 60 miles is about 100km. The radius of the evacuation area is 30km.
Probably cleaner than "normal" produce, with all the pollution it deals with.