The paper is from 2005, so it might be worth saying that on the submission title.

And it's also worth mentioning that because Gelman and Shalizi have recently written a really nice paper about the philosophy of Bayes: http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/phil... (PDF) Gelman is a well-known "bayesian", and Shalizi is a well-known "not all that is interesting is bayes"-ian.