Comment by michaelochurch | Hacker News Reader

Comment by michaelochurch | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

With meditation, the failure mode (if you're not ready for higher levels of conscious experience) is... non-experience. It can be frustrating to sit for half an hour and experience nothing (we've all been there) but it won't put you in a mental hospital.

With psychedelics, the failure modes are a lot worse.

I feel like psychedelics are karmic time-accelerators, by a factor of about 100-1000. The good news is that, in a way, this means that you can have a month's worth of experience in a few hours. The negative is that, if there's something negative about to ripen in the next six months, a trip can have you encountering it immediately and deprive you of the time to react to it and get the help, or make the changes, that you need.

Also, there's a perception that "meditation" is closed-eye sitting, and that you don't get to experience the external world while doing it. That's not entirely true. There are walking meditations, for just one example, and one of the goals of many meditative practices is to bring that meditative mind into your daily life. That's easier said than done; it's quite difficult, to tell the truth, and probably not desirable, for average working people, to bring the meditative mind into all aspects of daily life.

All that said, these drugs shouldn't be illegal (even for personal use, what a person wants to do with his or her own body isn't the state's business) and they definitely deserve more research. I think they have a lot of potential and deserve further study, and that the stigma/illegality do more harm (in terms of supply problems, set-and-setting issues) than good.

Thanks for the reply. I actually wasn't aware that there are forms of meditation where you experience the world around you and not just close your eyes, I'll definitely look into that.

Meditation is certainly the safer and less potent choice, nobody disagrees with that. Yet, I feel that the dangers of psychedelics are overstated, as long as you're careful and smart. Most of the bad experiences seem to come from a negative set/setting, not following the cardinal rules and too high of a dose. By starting with a small dose and gradually slowly increasing the dose for each trip you'll discover what your optimal dosage is in a gentle way with less risk of having a negative experience.

Research seems to back that up:

"One study found the most desirable results may come from starting with very low doses first, and trying slightly higher doses over months. The researchers explain the peak experiences occur at quantities only slightly lower than a sort of anxiety threshold. Although risks of experiencing fear and anxiety increased somewhat consistently along with dosage and overall quality of experience, at dosages exceeding the individual's threshold, there was suddenly greater increases in anxiety than before. In other words, after finding the optimum dose, returns diminish for using more (since risks of anxiety now increase at a greater rate)."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psilocybin_mushroom#Effects

Lets not forget that the "failure mode" of ordinary consumer culture awareness can be pretty extreme too

I would bet even money that open-plan offices cause more permanent mental illness than psychedelics.

That, however, is another debate.

In addition to sit down meditation, in my world view any activity you are fully involved in is meditative. That means that champion golfer, footballer, cricketer, coder, designer who are in the zone are meditating. I guess slowing down an activity and observing it as in tai chi is similarly meditative. That in essence is the point behind "Living in the Now" IMO.

These are easy to state but hard to practice and hence the allure of LSD's IMO

Reply on news.ycombinator.com