Microsoft does not have the power to seize domains. A federal court order made that happen. This order is (apparently) the responsibility of the U.S. District Court of Nevada. If you want to blame someone, then blame the court.
Obnoxious people ask courts to do obnoxious things every day. Good courts do not comply.
> Microsoft has no obligation to you. Your judicial system does.
In any case, there is no "hating the game" here. The fault -- if one has a problem with this action -- is not with "the system", but with a very specific player: the federal judge who issued the order. (I don't feel like going through the trouble of finding his/her name, but I doubt it would be difficult.)
Problem is, there is no good court. It's always vary case by case. Is the Supreme Court good court? It did rule in favor of gay married couples entitled to federal benefits but not so on some other issues. Laws are meant to be interpreted differently and handled differently by different judges at different time.
What you (and I and everyone is doing) is expressing our own opinion of how the complaint should be handle based on our interpretation of the law, responsibility, and society.