No one is Awesome by default. We all suck when we start out. No one is "expected" to be awesome - be they male or female. So I don't see how "Awesome Female Coder" implies that females are not expected to be awesome.
"Awesome female coder" implies "awesome among the set of female coders". Conversely, "female awesome coder" would better imply "female among the set of awesome coders".
It's not absolute -- both could charitably be read either way -- but the ordering chosen lends itself more to the less flattering interpretation.