The Thinkers: Black holes, black energy and the history of the universe
post-gazette.com
post-gazette.com
But I don't really know what that means. Some questions:
How much will the average temperature of the universe increase? Since energy is neither created nor destroyed, there's a finite amount of it in the universe, so there is an absolute maximum (average) temperature, if all of it were converted to heat (Nobody's holding out on us with a _preexisting_ infinite energy source, right? (How would that work? I'm not really sure. But it would definitely obey the no-creation clause they stuck on the universe.))
How long will it take? If it takes even a few billion years, we'll probably have wiped ourselves out. I guess I'm contradicting myself... let me qualify my belief, then. As long as we haven't gotten to us first, then the increasing entropy of the universe will do us in. =P
I think that last one largely depends on universal efficiency, ie the rate of loss-to-heat of various energy conversions. (Sounds like black holes are pretty bad. Converting up to 40% of mass's kinetic energy to heat... talk about heat pollution! (But wait. Heat is kinetic energy on a molecular scale, right? So really that conversion is just large-scale motion to small-scale motion. I guess that's actually a definition of entropy: Conversion of cohesiveness into even distribution. Or random distribution, I should say.)
I think I should stop now. Apologies for rambling. =)