So Dan Lyons Called
daringfireball.net
daringfireball.net
Capitalizing on Gruber’s mistake, John Lyons writes a post that primarily ridicules _Apple_ for its obsession with secrecy and for its contemptuous relationship with the media. Yes, he does make fun of Gruber, but it’s from the point of view of Fake Steve. Lyons himself isn’t saying Gruber is a “dipshit”, he’s saying that he bets that’s how Steve Jobs thinks of him.
In return, Gruber seems to really scrape the barrel to find ammunition for a purely ad hominem attack, ridiculing Lyons’ day job and implying that his writing is disingenuous. I takes a serious lack of perspective to call the creator of Fake Steve Jobs a tool of old media.
Maybe it is all fun and games, but they don’t write about that stuff on their blogs so it’s impossible to tell. From my point of view Gruber’s reply doesn’t read as friendly or jocular. Lyons calls Gruber a egotistical, obnoxious fanboy and jokes that Apple hatched a wide-reaching conspiracy just to trick him into a journalistic mistake. Fair enough.
Gruber “jokes” that Lyons writes limp, insincere, watered-down articles for a failing magazine. Maybe Gruber misjudged his tone, but ouch. I’d be hurt if Gruber wrote that about me. I’d be hurt if a _friend_ wrote that about me.
They don't have to be drinking buddies for this to be a sincere form of flattery.
Edit: oh -- http://www.fakesteve.net/2009/08/dear-gruber-youve-been-pwne...
Not entirely undeserved.
How on earth did Apple manage to turn consumer electronics into a drama-rich soap opera? And more to the point, why?