137 Rails ideas hacked together in 48 hrs
r09.railsrumble.com
r09.railsrumble.com
* Extremely well run. zapnap, if you're ever in Perth, I'll buy you a steak. awesome job guys.
* There's a comment about the longevity of the entries here. Can't speak for others, but I entered just for fun and for the experience. I built something quick and simple that I planned to throw away, however...
* The quality of the feedback was fantastic. The criticism my app received was very constructive (and justified :), but there was also some very positive feedback, enough that I'm going to take what I've created, keep working on it and keep it going.
I entered as a solo entrant, and my app was pretty simple but there's so much I learnt; for example, setting up a server. I've never done this before (always had someone else to do it for me), but I've had to learn how to get everything up and running from nothing. Too me a stupidly long time to do, but I had a great time doing it.
The organizers truly did an amazing job, and we can't wait for voting to end so that we can act on the feedback we've gotten and start making improvements.
I've gone through a couple of those lists now, including a large number of 'rate my startup' type posts on HN and usually when I visit them a couple of weeks later there is either nothing left of it or the site has been taken over by spammers.
It's like with children, making them is easy, supporting them over their lifetime is hard, very hard.
So, what's the story, how many of those 'one night hacks' make it in the long run ?
http://tastyplanner.com http://meetinbetween.us
Both are still running and doing quite well. Although no one has made a million dollars on a Rumble exit quite yet, we're looking forward to the first one :). Maybe someone will buy us a steak for organizing the event heh.
* http://prioritizd.com * http://bidbuildbill.com * http://jot.ly * http://imatightwad.com * http://qflip.net * http://trackclass.com * http://whatdoesthiserrormean.com * http://remindr.info * http://www.riverdex.com * http://www.learnbylikis.com * http://so2speak.net * http://pictmeme.com * http://ndebted.com * http://pricepounce.info
If you check the discussion list and do some Twitter searches you'll find that many teams advertised that they were looking for collaborators that way. Still, probably not the best mechanism for that.
To expand on the previous post and your post as well, some sort of "team finder" would be really cool.
Great, great job.
Most commercially viable web applications find their success through execution of their idea and connecting with an end user audience. So it seems, to me, like the best way to judge their likelihood of success in the "real world" is by reviewing the end product rather than the integrity of the code.
If they didn't write tests, if their authorization code is full of holes, if there are XSS vulnerabilities everywhere -- end users are going to find these. They're also going to comment on them, and these comments will affect other ratings and overall public opinion.
I'm a developer myself and of course I have my opinions about the 'right way' to write code. But judging from that perspective isn't part of the contest for a reason. Not that it's wrong, it's just not the perspective that we're approaching it from.
Edit: just saw that the long list has descriptions.
Prior to the competition, teams can prepare as much as they like, with pretty much the only proviso being no creation of any digital artifacts. This means no code and no digital artwork can be created before the 48hrs starts, but teams are allowed to do as much non-digital (ie. pencil and paper) prep as they deem necessary.
Sure, there's room for people to cheat if they wish, but I think it's disingenuous to throw out a "i bet a lot of people cheated" comment instead of perhaps crediting them with good planning, hard work and skill.