Denver's tax on web and app development draws ire from software execs
denverpost.com
denverpost.com
Is this supposed to be a joke?! Seriously, what kind of bullsh.t is this?
I accept having to pay VAT and customs when importing stuff from another country, but from another city in the same country?
Sorry, but the way I see this is as a perfect thing to (ab)use as a government if you want to crack down on someone... don't enforce it, only when doing a "random tax compliance audit"...
It's inefficient, but how else would a local tax scheme be at all enforceable?
This isn't an import tax, this is an anti-evasion provision so some city elsewhere can't unilaterally undermine this city's tax policy.
The USA recognizes state law as a defends against Federal tyranny.
In this case, the law allows for local tyranny. Just imagine e.g. a 30% sales tax - as long as you live in the city, you have no way of getting around this tax: "If you can't afford to move... well, not my problem"
ps -- and if you can't be arsed to vote, then don't bitch about the results
There is a companion tax called 'use tax' which mirrors the components of sales tax but it specific to the place where something is used. The 'problem' that use tax was created to solve was that people would go to the city or state next door and buy things at one tax rate, for use in an area where they were also available but at a (generally) higher tax rate. Use tax laws give cities and states the power to collect the difference in taxes from the user.
It is nearly impossible to enforce, but it is a useful 'kicker' in an audit of an entity that keeps good records.
It would be more like Norwegians crossing the border to Sweden to stock up on cheap beer - which already happens. I believe you sometimes see similar things in Ireland at the Northern Ireland/EIRE border, depending on VAT and currency exchange rates.
Try purchasing a car in a state having a lower sales tax rate than your own. You won't escape your local jurisdiction's tax rate.
That said, saying a 3.6% tax makes a software business uneconomical is pretty silly. If that makes the difference between profitability and unprofitability either the business was mostly investing profits internally into growth or was nearly uneconomical anyway. It mostly sounds to me like bitching that the owners may have to settle for Hawaii instead of St Barts this year.
Ok, a 3.6% tax is fine, I agree. How about five 3.6% taxes? Oh, now it's just being ridiculous right? Except that's exactly what the tax creep ends up being when you have politicians drunk on spending just to spend.
The US tax code is a perfect example of how this works.
Its possible that its not what the full $35K is for, but if you are bringing in $4 Million a year in revenue, you can probably afford a qualified accountant to take care of this stuff and I can't be all that sympathetic.