He didn't take anything apart. He's just another leftist that has a hard time comprehending that some people have differently ideological views that his own.
You're implying that anybody that disagrees is irrational and biased. Worse, you proclaim it requires broad agreement.
Which part do you struggle with exactly?
Edit: and when I say broad I mean "general" i.e. you don't have to treat everything he is saying as gospel but it's hard to argue with the general gist of the post (at least in my opinion it is).