Meet the New Filepicker Team
blog.filepicker.io
blog.filepicker.io
The team decided that the right thing to do was to sell to someone that would: 1. Value and support existing customers 2. Return as much money as possible to investors, and 3. Allow the team to move on to new opportunities. (In priority order)
I have a tremendous amount of respect for the new team, and actually think they will do a better job with filepicker.io, because they are committed to its success as a company and a business rather than some distant vision.
For those who were fans of what we were trying to do at Ink (helping connect the apps and services that people use), I'm still committed to the dream and seeing if we can do it in a slightly different way at IFTTT.
At some point I may do a more full post-mortem, for now if you have any questions hit me up at <my username>@gmail.com
Yesterday while checking on something I logged in and noticed the Ink side disappeared and now they're introducing a new team.
I love you guys but be honest, be merciless. What went wrong? Why drop Ink? Why the new team? It'll be better than this pablum PR puff.
Maybe the new team could list their full names? Bit strange to have "meet the new team" but not have their names and where they've come from.
Then, despite the title, they don't actually introduce the team. Just some tiny images and only their first names.
I wish there was more context here and explained if the product was going away or not. On a personal note: I had talked with Brett and Anand repeatedly in the past, it would've been nice to get more details.
I really hope the service doesn't disappear!..
If I see rebrand, then all founders removed, why should I have confidence that this company is going to be sustainable and not just live off VC funding?
Let me search something other than CC stuff. Just straight up enable Google images (or gasp, even Bing images).
Every external dependency or middleman you require hands over some control of your product or service to someone else. You put yourself in their hands and are at their mercy. And for what? Convenience? Laziness? When there are standard, proven, tested FOSS solutions that don't depend on middlemen, that you can debug and fix yourself?
Web sites are becoming far too interdependent. It wasn't many years ago when web sites had ZERO external, third-party resources, except banner ads. Now every page loads 35 JavaScripts from OTHER DOMAINS, all of which run in the context of the site the user is actually intending to visit. And several of them usually are required, or else the site looks horrible or breaks completely. It's madness.
I strongly agree.
I weep for what the web could have been. I don't think people realise what they're losing. Sure, you get some nice CSS or JS stuff, but we've lost platform independence.
Over the years there have been a few campaigns with little banner-buttons. Some of those have been bad ([BEST VIEWED WITH IE!]) but some of them were good.
It would be amazing if there was a campaign to get websites to validate, and to fall-back gracefully, and to be accessible.
I'd also love it if web creators would test sites on real hardware and real networks. My iPhone / android / 3G stick on GiffGaff or (what was) T-Mobile in SW UK is probably much worse than whatever you're using.
What are you talking about? This is much better than an acquihire. They've built a good product that people like; it just isn't VC material, as it turns out. So they've found a way to keep their good product going.