Naive idiot alert.. could you process the "same" DNA numerous times then take the mode in each case? Or are the errors essentially ones that would be repeated each time?
In practice though, even with these "circular consensus sequencing" reads, the error model is significantly higher than other technologies.
CCS still works really well if you want incredibly high accuracy. See this paper and figure 3 for Q90 quality reads: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3811116/
But most people don't need that for their applications. So just regular consensus using PacBio data alone is sufficient for excellent (Q60 or better) consensus accuracy: https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/GenomicConsensus/blob/...