Americans Rate Government (1st), Self-Employment (2nd) as Top Job Choices
rasmussenreports.com
rasmussenreports.com
Has anyone ever seen any scientific evidence comparing productivity of private sector vs. public sector employees?
Protip: Privated AAA does everything the DMV does.
also the fact that Yes, Minister is regarded as the most accurate show about politics ever made. My above mentioned study seems to confirm that it is indeed scarily accurate.
Most people don't live for their jobs, the job is just a paycheck. The federal government provides some of the most secure, highest paying with most benefits jobs in this economy.
Sadly for the US, an ever growing government sector does not lead to long term prosperity, because government almost never creates value. Exceptions like funding for basic science and some infrastructure exist, but overall it's a definite net loss.
But that's not what he said. He said:
1. ...an ever growing government sector does not lead to long term prosperity
2. ...[despite a couple useful things like infrastructure and science] overall [our current government] is a definite net loss.
OP wasn't advocating anarchy. He thinks USG is not doing a good job with their resources, which isn't a particularly radical point of view.
I didn't quite make the claim that he advocates anarchy, but I am questioning his attitude of trying to have and to eat his cupcake.
Small and efficient governments which create law and order are good for growth. They themselves do not create the growth, but they create the necessary conditions for growth.
Government spending on the other hand, with few exceptions, does not create new value and doesn't even create the conditions for new value. It can create additional demand. If the source of the spending is debt, it can be stimulating in the short term, but it rarely is, see Japan's attempts to stimulate through government spending.
Big or huge governments almost certainly are a significant net drain on productivity.