No, he's upset that Snowdenrevealed that the government is doing things that affect his investments. His comments make it sound like the government is neutral or somehow the victim in this.
Sounds like a similar POV as those that believe security by obscurity is adequate.
The first rule of security is you do not talk about security.
Listen to his statement again. He believes that foreign governments -- who already knew about US spy operations -- are using Snowden's leaks as political cover to enact protectionist policies. After all, every other wold power engages in exactly the same type of behavior. But, without a Snowden of their own, they don't have the PR problem that the US does.