Notes for Signalling Unit Log for Flight MH370 [pdf]
i2.cdn.turner.com
i2.cdn.turner.com
There have been all sorts of theories about the math and data. So we finally have the data and others can peak into it. Although, I suspect we are going to see some crazy new theories now. Here are just some of the links I found while researching the topic and what to do with this raw data:
http://www.reddit.com/r/MH370/comments/218i36/how_the_satell...
http://physicsbuzz.physicscentral.com/2014/03/how-did-inmars...
http://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/2623/how-did-the...
Watch out for errors.
MH370 was a 777-200ER. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysia_Airlines_Flight_370
That gives it a range of 7725 nautical miles. http://www.boeing.com/boeing/commercial/777family/pf/pf_200p...
Cruise speed is 0.84 mach at 35000 feet which is around 500mph.
That's only 4000 miles of the 7000 mile range.
If this is the full log including some time on the ground it would seem like they didn't necessarily run out of fuel.
Kuala Lumpar to Beijing is about 2700 miles so I suppose they would probably carry enough fuel for the flight plus some reserve. So the fly-til-empty theory is still plausible.
As you pointed out in one of your other comment, the way MH370 was so badly mishandled will probably dramatically affect the outcome of our ability to ever find the aircraft. Although this data is interesting, I'm not optimistic there's anything much we can do with it that hasn't already been done. I suppose it serves as public evidence that the aircraft was indeed flying for the claimed duration earlier news reports suggested. But I don't recall anyone who was in disagreement with that figure.
Conspiracists are undoubtedly quite happy to see this data, and although it's fun to consider outlandish possibilities, I wouldn't dare try my hand at speculating what the "ufologists" must believe happened.
[1] http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/tech_ops/read.main/...