I read it as
"Organic Cat Litter Chief" - "Suspect in Nuclear Waste Accident"
As opposed to
"Organic Cat Litter" - "Chief Suspect in Nuclear Waste Accident"
I kept wondering when the CEO of a Cat Litter company was going to be blamed for something.
I read it as
"Organic Cat Litter Chief" - "Suspect in Nuclear Waste Accident"
As opposed to
"Organic Cat Litter" - "Chief Suspect in Nuclear Waste Accident"
I kept wondering when the CEO of a Cat Litter company was going to be blamed for something.
I read this headline exactly the same way as you, and I actually felt relieved to know that the cat litter CEO was not a suspect in this accident!
I think it's a lesson for headline writers: Sure, write your headline as terse and tight as you can make it. But at least re-read it a few times to make sure it isn't ambiguous.
Another way to put it: "What would Experts Exchange think of this headline?"
A new Tzar appointment by the President.
(I also misinterpreted it at first glance)