http://rapgenius.com/James-somers-herokus-ugly-secret-annota...
edit - I like rap music.
Heroku should own up to - and has owned up to, in my opinon- their communications fiasco. But I really, really hope the linked RapGenius article doesn't mislead folks to believe intelligent routing is easy (Tom Lehman, the then CTO of RapGenius, admits that he himself is a novice about distributed locks and such: http://s3.amazonaws.com/rapgenius/1361210233_heroku-adam-con...)
EDIT: minor grammatical clarifications
It's hard to separate the product from the creator. We can demand a higher standard of creators, but one of the consequences will be fewer creations.
Moghadam's behavior, while not one of polite society, isn't necessarily separate from the community that Rap Genius serves. Compare Moghadam to famous and successful rappers who haven't been fired from their jobs for quite similar behavior.
It's not a "higher" standard. It's the same normal standard of professional behavior I expect from anyone I do business with, and Rap Genius consistently fails to meet it.
You might be able to argue that "professional" behavior is not the standard in SV, I'll give you that.
But making disgusting comments like he did on Rap Genius, twitter, and his blog is not "normal" nor acceptable in any industry. We should all expect and demand better behavior than this from all business leaders- no matter what.
I can forgive someone for making a mistake. 1, maybe even 2 times- make a slip like this, realize you fucked up, apologize, get on with it. But he has a history of comments like this, and that's what has to stop.
With that said, I'm not sure I can get on board with firing someone just for making comments, as terrible as they might be. Is Rap Genius really going to be worse off by keeping him around than by firing him?
I feel like I can't come up with a strong enough argument to fire him, so why do it? The burden of proof is on the other side.
I don't understand your point here. I can quite easily imagine a RapGenius like service being created by someone who's not an utter dickbag. In other words, I fail to see anything inherent to RapGenius which requires douchbaggery of its creator. Are you suggesting that there is?
I can imagine quite a few things too, but reality has a different take on things. At the end of the day, he did ... and nobody else stepped up.
Is he immature? Yeah. Rather than firing such individuals, I think a bit of social pressure can make them behave like civilized people. Firing them is a bit overkill.
I don't want to live in a society were people lose their livelihood over saying something stupid, even if saying intelligent things is part of their job description.
Frankly, if I had to guess, I think they wanted him gone and used this as an excuse to get rid of him.
I'm sure mining his tweets and IMs will provide endless entertainment but the two I like best so far are how he blamed his brain tumor for making him act like a dick. Now that it was removed he blames the operation for making him act like a dick.
The poor guy had his skull sawed open and a thing pulled out of his brain. And yet, effortlessly, he sucked all the sympathy out of me. THAT'S genius.
Perhaps you should channel that envy into giving your kids a similar upbringing instead of moping how your parents did not?
I mean, that's not a real high bar there.
For us, this is yet another startup exec who most likely has a serious problem with women.
I would expect even the btards to not behave like that.
Edit: there is a sorority full of women who where targeted by Elliot and are lucky to be alive today because they didn't answer their thick door when he attempted to get in [1].
Elliot Rodger pounded on the sorority house front door while, inside, the
young women he yearned to slaughter were preparing for another Friday night,
authorities said.
The awkward 22-year-old was obsessed with exacting "retribution" for what he
experienced as a lifetime of social and sexual isolation, and had planned
meticulously to target as many people as possible, according to a manifesto
he left behind and a YouTube video since removed. But here again, he was
denied access to those he felt should worship him.
So when no one answered after several minutes, Rodger improvised.
[1] http://www.cbsnews.com/news/thwarted-in-his-plan-california-...The comment you replied to was lamenting the fact that there are no quality alternatives with more respectable people behind them.
Also FWIW, a huge number of news organizations have attempted "to profit, through pageviews and ad revenue" by posting stories or otherwise commenting on the murders in Isla Vista. Should we also be complaining about CNN, The New York Times, MSNBC and just about every other news organization in the United States?
Benefit gained from cancer cure is far higher than detriment from some idiotic comments online an a semi-spammy marketing campaign that was swiftly punished. Net effect is very positive.
"I'm not supporting this by principle!" people vary from legitimate and caring to just pretentious and snobby.
I would understand not supporting a lot of the biggest hardware OEMs for prioritizing machine production cost over the quality of human life (Foxconn and other very popular, very cheap Chinese production manufacturers that employ some really sketchy tactics to keep that production cheap). Obviously for you to make such a strong decision, I'd expect you to have read a lot, way more than whatever Apple-scapegoating bullshit you've read in mainstream media and on Reddit (the whole Foxconn thing is very popular with, like, every OEM, by the way, not just Apple), making sure you knew who and who wasn't actually breaking your very strong principle and to what extent you can expect a company to provide "quality of human life" and what that even means, etc.
But when you boldly declare you won't support a company, no matter what they do, because a co-founder made some stupid and tasteless comments (said company later fucking fired said co-founder) and because they unwittingly executed on a really spammy marketing campaign (which caused them to get kicked off of Google for WEEKS as punishment)?
Where were you when RapGenius made apparent some glaring inefficiencies in Heroku? Where were you when RapGenius was building the most accurate, most well-designed, most comprehensive repository of lyrics and text annotations on the web?
You're really deciding to wave your huge "muh principles. I HAVE STRONG BELIEFES" cock on the Internet because of a couple insensitive comments?
As for the general culture on HN regarding hating the general culture around RapGenius ... so what if their general behaviors are different than yours. What's unprofessional to you is just fun to them. Everyone behaves in different ways; ivy tower academics from researcher academics from front-end web developers from game developers from humanities majors from STEM majors from musicians from DJs from ... there's nothing objectively worse about the rap culture behind RapGenius.
Sure, that culture may sometimes throw around otherwise offensive remarks. But remember that the context behind a word is infinitely more important than the word itself. The context behind the usage of the word "faggot" is much, much more important than the meaningless combination of the letters 'f','a','g','g','o', and 't' and the pronunciation of those combined letters. If an immature 13 year old were to input "faggot" in a text-to-speech program, the text-to-speech program would very clearly say "faggot". You wouldn't blame the program : it's just executing on a pronunciation algorithm. The context is just the manipulation of bits and bytes on a stream. It's harmless. You wouldn't exactly flog the kid, either, he just has a poor sense of humor, and you'd just roll your eyes at that.
The problem we have with the word "faggot" is that, in the majority of cases, it's being used in a pretty offensive context, and said context says a lot of things about the person using the word.
But when the RapGenius cofounder says offensive stuff (I heard one of them insulted Mark Zuckerberg at a conference?), often the context is just lighthearted jabs.
They may be unprofessional and insensitive jabs, but given that they're A) just meaning harmless fun and B) building one of the most comprehensive and well-designed text annotation sites on the Internet, we give them some cultural license to have their shitty taste in humor. In this specific case, obviously, they really overexploit that cultural license by saying such insensitive things on such a raw , emotional topic, but again, the guy got fucking fired.
The suggested motivation is disingenuous: someone actually interested in Rap Genius would at least have to admit that they have something pretty unique: there is no other place where a community actually sensibly annotates lyrics and texts. If you are interested in that, they are interesting to you. If you are not interested in that, the stories about them are irrelevant.