NASA's Next Mars Lander to Begin Construction
news.discovery.com
news.discovery.com
Aerial Regional-scale Environmental Survey (ARES)
NASA link: http://marsairplane.larc.nasa.gov/
Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerial_Regional-scale_Environme...
Robert Zubrin also wrote a proposal for a nuclear powered "hopper" that would use CO2 from the Martian atmosphere: NUCLEAR ROCKET USING INDIGENOUS MARTIAN FUEL [http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov]/199200...
If you had a battery plane with solar panels that could land to gather energy, then it could fly again, but the landing and takeoff might be extremely hazardous, with rocks and very high speeds.
Edit: Here's a good pdf presenting calculations about these issues, it also looks at pixel smear because of the high speed: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.78....
I've also wondered if you could use beamed microwave power to power a Mars airplane. For example, you could have a solar base station on the surface, and every hour or so the airplane would circle it closely and recharge its batteries. This only makes sense if you can make the microwave rectenna on the airplane much lighter than the equivalent solar cells. An airplane that never needs to land has some definite advantages. On the other hand, an easy way of acquiring geological samples is not one of them.
Another alternative is that you can use CO2 as an oxidizer -- Magnesium, for example, will burn in a C02 environment. Building a jet engine that runs on Magnesium is probably a non-trivial exercise, though!
If you really want to build a Mars airplane, I think nuclear is clearly the way to go. I don't know how you would test it though, since we tend to frown on running unshielded nuclear reactors these days.
These are all separate from the ARES concept that is already linked nearby.
Here's some examples:
[a long time ago, but serious] http://trs-new.jpl.nasa.gov/dspace/bitstream/2014/17308/1/99...
[Venus, or maybe Titan] http://www.astrobio.net/news-exclusive/up-up-and-away-with-a...
[Mars, with Earth demo] http://robotics.estec.esa.int/i-SAIRAS/isairas2005/session_1...
I learned that the Soviet Union used two small balloons to explore Venus in 1985.
edited to add:
I noticed a comprehensive design study for ARES which covers a lot of reasoning for tradeoffs:
http://www.cs.odu.edu/~mln/ltrs-pdfs/NASA-aiaa-2003-6578.pdf
Now zeppelins, on the other hand ...
wouldn't zeppelins be disadvantage by the thin air as well?
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Derelict_satellites_...
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Artificial_satellite...
I'd love to track how they've evolved different characteristics of spaceflight/rovers.
to improve my KSP game, obviously.