I am also in a country where you don't have to choose between pay or die, and I'm thankful for that. Seeing this kind of thing in print certainly makes you look twice and appreciate what you have.
Note that grandfathered plans are not subject to the out-of-pocket maximum until 2015.
P.S. Remember to vote in the 2014 and 2016 general elections if you live in a swing state.
This is toxic to democracy. People should vote no matter the state where they live otherwise it is only a tiny sliver of the swings that decided who rules the country and this allows for the money influx because you only have to buy/brainwash that sliver.
If a modern democracy manages to have 80% voter turnout you will be surprise how many safe seats will be not so safe.
So just vote - no matter where you live. It is your civil duty.
Are you suggesting that "people who decide to vote" is not a representative sample of the whole population? I am not sure of that, and a quick Google search shows mixed results.
> So just vote - no matter where you live. It is your civil duty.
I feel no loyalty to my country. I don't give a crap about civil duty. Most people I interact with feel the same way.
I really want to believe that's true, but I'm skeptical. Do you have any sort of research backing that up?
Shockingly they wanted to keep the price tag of ~3000$ you quoted which is > 95% of the population's gross annual income.
We also don't live in the US but he is lucky the drug company and his insurance pay 90% otherwise he'd be dead by now.
However, Obamacare is guaranteed to remain in effect only so long as the Democrats retain control of the Senate and the Presidency. If the Democrats lose one of them, then it will depend on whether certain vacancies open up on the Supreme Court. If they lose both, then that's the end of Obamacare.
I understand you're having a visceral reaction to the out-of-pocket maximum. But for the patient who has to take Gleevec for the rest of his life, it does not matter if he pays $1 for the premium and $10,000 for the medication, or $10,000 for the premium and $1 for the medication. It's the same $10,001 either way. It's just a matter of what you call it.
I think it's great that Poland reduced the premium to $0 for your father. But patients in many other countries still have to pay the premium even after they get sick. And nobody would say that their insurance refused to "pay for the treatment" just because it did not waive the premium. It becomes a matter of degree, not of principles.
The US still has the most expensive healthcare even after Obamacare. But at least it is now on the extreme end of the spectrum of universal health insurance. It is no longer off the charts.
For someone like the OP's dad, US is still not included. The $6k would cover, what, a month or two?