That's a pretty bold statement, and on the face of it incorrect.
Our messages was first and foremost to assure users that their money is still there. And then we made a comment on the market that we failed to succeed in.
Our messages was first and foremost to assure users that their money is still there. And then we made a comment on the market that we failed to succeed in.
But it struck me that you mentioned several times in the article that you know what and how to do, you just don't have the leverage of being the main body. Why would you deny it? Is it something bad? I don't think so. Would you refuse if Twitter or Facebook approached you with a decent offer?
Whether I would choose one thing or another is irrelevant.
If I wanted to get the company bought, or get a job, I'd just have a conversation with any of our awesome advisers to get directly in touch with pretty much anyone.