808 Cube
808cube.com
808cube.com
The 303, counterpart to the 808, is a famous example of this. Try and program in a preconceived, sensible melody and you'll be tearing out hair out. Bash in a semi random series of button pushes and the thing will produce instant acid techno.
EDIT: You could extrapolate this idea to different geometric shapes too, to achieve unconventional time-signiatures. Of course this would also limit/increase the number of of beat samples, too.
Pyramid would be 6/8 or 6/4 with only 4 samples, whereas dodecahedron would be 5/4 or 10/8 with 12 samples. That could be fun. Using the center as a beat as well could give 9/8, 7/8 and 11/8 for pyramid, cube and dodecahedron respectively.
Please read http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
The 808 instruments sound intrinsically familiar and make the mishmash you get from random play still sound cohesive and coherent. It's an unexpectedly good choice for music toys like this. Gotta love that cowbell
It's a neat toy though, maybe even useful for education.
This is used pretty much in electronic instruments or effects (nearly every drum machines or delay has a tap button).
One of the reasons this is so interesting is that the patterns are interchangeable and recognizable. Switch your bass drum and snare and you have a breakbeat track. Replace your cowbell with hi-hats and the beat starts chugging. The relationship between instruments and patterns is something that normal drum machines could never show you.
What's it doing? I'm not even sure if these beats are supposed to sound out of sync because I clicked something wrong, or because the whole thing is running at 3fps.
I just wish I could play with this thing!
This is an early 80s drum machine people, it should run on a 3 year old laptop, right?
(using Firefox 29, Chromium doesn't even display the cube)
EDIT: I also feel like many people here are looking at this with an unintended lens: it doesn't look like it was meant to be a convenient interface for mixing a specific beat. It's meant to be more Rubik's Cube than mixer, and if you look at it that way it's an entertaining experiment!
To me, the entertaining part was that you couldn't see or use the non-visible sections unless you rotated them into view: that is, unless you altered your original mix.
It makes the Rubik's Cube analogy come together (because without something to force you to vary it, it'd just be freely inputting what you wanted: and at that point, it'd just be a bad mixer interface).
I don't think it was meant to be convenient to use, but instead entertaining and emergent via treating it more like a Rubik's Cube than a mixer.
Not to get too far OT, but, I like "Built for Chrome" about as much as I liked "Built for Internet Explorer". This is a very cool app. If it needs to be built-for-x, then we all have more work to do.
(got NaN on tempo ...)