Hacker News Reader

It might be a detail, but it really bugs me: I think it would be much more fortunate to change "Linux" to "GNU/Linux". Even if you ignore the whole "GNU OS" thing, it still looks weird to have "Linux" and Android with ChromeOS as separate entries since both Android and ChromeOS use Linux as the kernel.

View on HN

True, but we all know exactly what that means.

Yes, obviously, that's why I call it a detail :)

Why GNU/Linux? Why not KDE/Linux?

I'm not trying to diss or dismiss GNU, but I think it's possible to have a functional linux desktop without any GNU software.

(Busybox, plus μClibc for example.)

You probably don't know what GNU means. Have a look. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU

It's certainly possible, but does anyone[1] actually do that?

Modern-day "Linux" desktop systems are pretty useless without GNU on top. I'm certainly not going to go all RMSy and insist on "GNU/Linux" on idealogical grounds, but it is more correct than simply "Linux".

[1] Stop being pedantic. By "anyone", I mean, "a minority large enough to be more than a rounding error".

Reply on news.ycombinator.com