Early on in your project, one of your partners, Dr. Omri Drory, claimed that you would be doing two things in particular with your project.
First, I wanted to respond to the critique in several ways: check out our post "radical openness": This will be totally transparent project – we will introduce a novel concept called "constant peer review" – In academia no one publish things that didn’t work – we will publish everything.
Can you please comment on your commitment to 'constant peer review'? I'm presuming this means that you intended blogging your "ups as well as your downs" (c.f. https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/antonyevans/glowing-pla... but your blog has been short on scientific details.
Secondly, in the statement, Dr. Drory stated We take being a good Steward of our backers funds as #1 priority. Our budget will also be publish online and you can see where the money went. Can you provide a link to this budget?
Thirdly, as far as I can tell from your scientific posts on your blog, you are still feeding the plant luciferin (the glow-in-the-dark chemical), in the photo that that the WSJ showed. Is this true? Or is the plant photographed biosynthesizing its own luciferin?