Ayn Rand has absolutely nothing to do with this, and you shouldn't use her name as a form of generic insult. That is just stupid.
Also, Ayn Rand wrote at length against anarchy, so your insult doesn't even make sense. She also wrote at length against the arbitrary use of force, which is what bullies use.
Other commentary on the writings of Ayn Rand, who definitely has some of the most dedicated fans I have ever met, can be found in a famous blog post by John Rogers.[2] I invite all the participants here to read it and see what you think.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Wales#Political_and_econ...
[2] http://kfmonkey.blogspot.com/2009/03/ephemera-2009-7.html
As for your other link, let's be clear: you are simply name-calling. The slander you are referring to (quoted below) does not describe me. Nor does it describe a great many other Objectivists. I know you have way more karma than me, but please keep this trashy behavior off of HN. None of this has anything to do with the subject at hand.
> One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world.
You might get more mileage by keeping trashy derails off of HN, instead. OP had some interesting things to say, who cares about the Ayn Rand thing.
Rand's Objectivism pretty much says that government is a necessary evil, then goes out of its way to try to put together a system that is minimally invasive. Rand herself hated self-described libertarians and anarchists.