But none of the information gained from the reflections were not obtainable in another way. In the first example with this image http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-G-MF-A05uSs/U2CA_n8IKfI/AAAAAAAAAZ... He claims it could be three possible hotels from that area. Yet it can actually only be one because there is only one hotel on that side of the road (you can see the road below). I went from that picture I just posted to the actual location without reading the rest of the blog. I have never stepped foot or even seen a photo of Miami. Those buildings are extremely unique. Once I found those buildings, I moved the view around in Google Maps to get me the EXACT point of reference which could have been two different hotels. but Like I said, only one on the correct side of the street.

On the second example, I was able to locate the picture simply by Google Maps. There aren't many buildings with domes on the top of it that is basically right next to water. It took me 3 minutes. Once I found it, I lined up the shot and found the building. There was only one it could have been. With a quick google search. To find which floor the picture was taken on, all I had to do was find which floor was completely straight in the photo (which means he was leveled with that floor) and then translate that height to the other building (by guessing). I guessed floor 17 which was one off and was the exact same guess as the blogger.

Basically, the blog post makes it seem he uses reflections to find where buildings were. In reality the reflections were not useful to locate the building, only to find interior shots after the location is discovered.