Crunched
mattmaroon.com
mattmaroon.com
The killer part of the app is that it offers the ability to bet online and get quick gratification. Draftmix hits the action player's sweet spot, and I suspect apps in this area will drastically outperform their season-long counterparts. Anyone familiar with gambling economics knows that the action players and casual gamers drive the economy.
The argument about skill vs. chance in the comments of the TechCrunch article is interesting. I think it's easy to make a compelling argument that success in the short term format might require more skill than season long formats, but legislators have demonstrated that compelling arguments hold less value than one might think they should.
We're staying away from states where that test is too stringent (i.e., many states ban games that involve any luck at all). In the ones in which we operate (39) the test is typically that luck is the predominant factor. We feel that given a large sample we can mathematically prove that a player can win over time regardless of luck. We're certainly seeing that so far.
Although given that what you're doing isn't odds adjusted, it's probably not that great a comparison.
You'd think picking week by week would control the randomness, certainly you're much less likely to be hit by an injury which would be one of the largest random components. Also players tend play well or badly in patches.
All the major sports leagues are notorious for protecting their brands and trademarks -- NFL, MLB, NHL,etc -- , simply look at the licensing deals some sites like Yahoo have needed to go through. And to top it off, they are mixing in virtual dollars (gambling) into the mix, which has been under fire recently in the U.S.
Its an untapped market for sure, but a snake-pit in litigation issues. May be the next YouTube you never know, but I doubt it, the sports leagues are more aware of the online world the movie studios.
Matt you've got to learn to better appreciate your team, future Steve Jobs or not.
I haven't been able to get an invite so I don't know how draftmix works. But using an applet for the live draft client gives me a huge advantage--I can use the same exact code on the client and server sides.
I assume you're using Flash on the client and something else on the server.
This means you have to maintain two versions of the same exact code. Every bug you find has to fixed twice.
Also, your goal in a startup is not to make it easy for you to code, but to make it easy for your users to play. (You only do the former where it assists with the latter.) Java does not accomplish that. People don't want to piss with JRE. It is a bloated nightmare that crashes people's systems, nags them about updates, slows down bootup, etc.
Everyone has Flash. In fact, more people have flash than javascript (turned on) making it the most commonly accepted environment. It and AJAX are really the only acceptable choices for a live draft.
Applets have clunky startup/shutdown processes. That's their main problem. Aside from that, they duplicate the desktop experience quite accurately, unlike Ajax, which is a permanent kludge.
Plus, how else are we going to play Kid Icarus without applets:
http://www.davieboy.net/play/game.all.play.asp?rom=11.zip...
Flash is nearly as painful, but I was at least able to get it working. Additionally, with so many sites using Flash, it's hard to ignore all of them. I used Flashblock for a while because I was tired of pointless Flash (Flashblock allows you to activate a Flash object if you wish), but so many sites used Flash that I found the plugin to be a hindrance rather than something I appreciated.
Personally, if a site avoids using Flash or applets altogether (GMail comes to mind), I appreciate it that much more. When Javascript doesn't get the job done, Flash, to me, is definitely the lesser of two evils.
Linux has many inconveniences that have been gradually disappearing. On the other hand, the benefits that it offers are something that I have no hope of getting from a proprietary solution. I've only been using it for less than a year and a half, and I'm finding that my day-to-day usage has become more efficient than my Windows experience by leaps and bounds. I admit that I occasionally become frustrated by certain activities (wireless networking and suspend/hibernation routines come to mind), but even things like this are getting easier thanks to not-yet-1.0 software like NetworkManager.
I seriously expect that within a few more years, Linux will be no harder to use than any other OS out there, with the added benefit of it being more free and flexible than any other option. Problem solved.
On another note, if (as a service provider) you came back to me with that proposition, that would be a surefire way to lose a customer. I postulate that the average Linux customer would be more helpful to you than the average Windows or even Mac customer, as I would expect a higher level of technical savvy (less frivolous calls/e-mails to customer service) and a higher likelihood to file legitimate bug reports. If you are chasing these people away, you are losing on more than one count.
When deciding what OS(or whatever) to use try and focus on more than one thing. Otherwise you end up focusing on the wrong things. I average less than 1 hour a month messing with my XP box at home. So for me messing with other desktop OS's is a waste of time.
PS: I have written low level networking code for Mac OS 7 though OS X, BSD Unix, and Linux so I know the alternatives far better than most people, but IMO as a home desktop windows just works. And at the end of the day don't you have more important things to do with your time than muck around with your OS?
It might seem hard to believe, but I seriously use Linux because I find it more convenient. I set up my own home network using a Linux machine with several Ethernet interfaces and one wireless one. It runs a wireless access point that I can configure to allow connections based on any rules I wish. It's running a DHCP server and a DNS server to hand out IP addresses and aliases for services like printing (just print to http://printer:631/printers/laser_printer). I'm sharing a networked laser printer with anyone on my internal network, meaning I can fire up a print job from my laptop downstairs and it's finished by the time I get upstairs. I have a low-overhead firewall running to ensure only desired ports are accessible from the outside, and I have easy SSH access from wherever I can happen to connect on my laptop or cell phone.
I plan on deploying early-stage web software on this same machine for testing and evaluation. One ISP in my area offers a standard cable internet service that comes with 3 IP addresses. This means that I can fire up three different web servers listening on each address and run three different web sites from this machine without anyone knowing any better. Moreover, I can easily configure these servers to startup at boot time, so that I don't have to worry about starting everything up properly in the event of a reboot.
Speaking of reboots, it is a very rare occurrence for me; I can run my computer for months without ever having to restart it, even after a re-install of every program on my computer. The only time a restart is ever necessary is while switching to a new kernel version, and I think there are even ways around that, although I think it would be easier to just reboot. Windows requests a restart nearly every time a program is uninstalled or an update is applied. When I want to install a new program, I don't go searching on Google for one and worrying about viruses, or trying to find currently-maintained stuff on SourceForge; I merely type "esearch program_I_want" and get a list of matches, or I can look under meaningful categories in /usr/portage to find what I'm looking for if I don't know exactly what program I'm looking for.
I like a GUI just as much as anyone else; it definitely simplifies a lot of tasks. For really complex stuff, though, a GUI can get in the way as you have to go through several levels of menus to change an option that you may only need changed for one run, only to change it back later. With Linux, most programs do have GUI interfaces, but a powerful command line is only a Ctrl-Alt-T away, and Linux taught me not to be scared of it. Using the power of the command line, I can do things like playing a Stevie Ray Vaughan and Jimi Hendrix mix by typing
mplayer -shuffle `find /media/music -iname '*vaughan*' -o -iname '*hendrix*'`
I just migrated from using mainly a desktop machine to a laptop I recently purchased. All I had to do was get the initial environment up and running, copy over /var/lib/portage/world from my old computer to my new computer and run "emerge -e world", then copy over my personal directory under /home/my_username, and my entire environment was identical to what it had been under my previous setup.
I'm sorry if it seems like I'm just running through a laundry list of features, and I'm aware that some of these things are possible on Windows, but my point is that I am getting functionality out my Linux machine that I never had while using Windows, and I've been able to find extensive online help and documentation for everything I've wanted to do, all without spending a penny. Sure, I may have invested a little extra time here and there, but that time wasn't wasted. While spending the time troubleshooting problems or setting my system up, I was also learning a lot more about how my computer worked. In most cases, the solution is a permanent one. In other words, when I've had a problem with my Linux machine, I've typically been able to find the solution and fix it for good. So many tasks on my computer can be automated, it's ridiculous, while I feel like my Windows experience involved constant maintenance.
Okay... that turned out much longer than I had expected, but I hope it's clear that I'm not with Linux for idealistic or monetary reasons, but because I legitimately find it to be more appropriate for what I want to do with my computer. I think that if more people put a little effort into understanding it (and as Linux gets more mainstream and user friendly), many people will begin to appreciate the things they can do with the full power of their computer in their grasp.
So back on the topic of Java, yeah... I have had trouble getting it running in my browser, but so few sites use it these days that it's just not a high-priority issue for me. If someone is expecting me to jump through hoops to get a site to work, that person has just lost a user, especially when there are so many alternative sites out there that work quite well with better-supported alternatives like AJAX or Flash.
The problem is paravirtualization still isnt supported in the x64 kernel. So its still too slow to do heavy tasks in. And you still need lots of ram and cores if you want to do lots of simultaneous work.
In terms of the timeline it is. It has been replaced by Flash and now AIR and Silverlight are trying to do what Applets were used for. SUN seems to be moving away from them as well, by introducing WebStart.
The reality though is that applets are significantly faster now, and they are very powerful. But I doubt this will change the impression most people have of them. Flash does most of what you would need, and now there is AIR if you need access to the file system or other low level functionality.
I think a mistake Sun is making is with all the branding they do with applets. Showing a Java logo each time an applet launches is a shameless plug and leaves an impression that a lot of crap is loading. The bootstrap process should be more seamless, in my opinion. They still have not changed this as far as I know.
If a website is slow, and looks ugly users are going to be less likely to use it.