We built a working software using Node.js and Chrome Extensions in less than 3 months, to reach that second stage of funding.
As our baseline was not clear, our market not proven and probably because of the investors suspicions, we never got an answer (well he had: "we'll see later").
I forgot to mention this product was based on scientific research about graph theories and user behaviours in an established society.
From science to market, another challenge as one needs to distinguish the scientific interest of a feature vs. a sellable feature on a business market.
The hiring has been made against our will, and we could not prevent it to happen (again, 52% shares by the CEO, all the power in a unique pair of hands etc.)
The number of analysts is wrong as well: especially when you lack of customers. Hirings have been made in case of signing the huge contracts in the process of being signed.
An attempt to scale too early, with blurry indicators which made us thinking we eventually needed them.
Anyway, considering how much money was burnt every months, it would not have saved us much more than 1 or 2 extra months.
I think this is tight to the personality of the guys allowing the expenses. In that case, the "I want to make sure you don't need my money" investor advice makes a lot of sense: they want to make sure your head is not going to burn because of the euphoria effect. Yesterday you had 0, today you have millions.
On another scale, you have people unable to manage a daily budget. This is the same on a (wrong) business scale.
But agreed, this is lame.