Al Feldstein, the Soul of Mad Magazine, Dies at 88
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
I would get in trouble with my parents becaue I'd be up until 2am reading MAD by my nightlight and would be exhausted in school the next morning. But MAD taught me more than my public school could've: it gave me a real-world education, the view that things are messed up and broken and that jokers, pranksters, spitballers, and rabble-rousers may be on to something after all.
MAD used to be incredibly intellectual in the earlier days, which makes sense considering the bulk of its audience was college students (whereas nowadays the diminishing readership is probably mostly tweens and manchildren). MAD exposed me to D.H Lawrence, to Virgil and Homer, to a huge array of cultural references across manifold genres. For only a few bucks an issue (cheap!), I was taken away from my suburban bubble and thrust into an irreverent comedic realm that was a catalyst for many of my own projects. I got in a lot of trouble at school because I turned all my assignments on their head but I wouldn't have it any other way.
Also lets not forget MAD's contribution to the hacker culture: they published Donald Knuth's portzebie measurement system!
Anyway as someone who grew up with the wonderful weird humour of Mad and the wonderful wacky art from guys like Don Martin, Mort Drucker (I remember the Mad movie parodies better than I remember the actual movies), Jack Davies etc, I feel sad to hear that it seems to have lost it's once great appeal.
Actually I just recalled an exchange from the Mad spoof on Return of the Jedi, went something like this (when I read it so many moons ago it was in swedish, don't know how it relates to the original english version):
Darth Vader: the rebuilding of the death star is taking too long, you will have to work faster.
Officer: But we are already working 14 hours a day!
Darth Vader: You'll need to double your efforts.
Officer: And work 28 hours a day?
Darth Vader: I'm a sadist, not a mathematician.
This is Mad magazine to me.Perhaps it has something to do with the types of humor?
Monty Python, for example, tends to create comedy from the over-exaggeration of pure logic. I think we, as programmers, tend to do that anyway; to see it portrayed on the silver screen is great, and maybe we also get a sense of relief from realizing that we aren't the only ones coming up with such silliness, albeit mentally.
Same sort of traits abound in Dr.Demento and MAD. 'Wet Dream' and most of the 'Lighter side of...' series are similar. Take a logical premise, and take it to the point of silliness.
RIP. I have fond memories of MAD, and it definitely helped created the person I am today.
Why commit suicide, only because the last issue was sold out...
RIP Al & thanks, two of my favorites down.
I'll go find my catsuit now I guess.
It's impossible.
There is a percent of my youth related to "Spy vs. Spy", "The Lighter Side of..." and of course, every parody. Classic.
He's no doubt laughing right now at the irony of the NYT's mistake.