Google AdSense Leak – Part 2

There is no way we can be certain this "second" part to the leak is actually even a legitimate followup to the first leak (assuming the first leak was legitimate).

In the future, if a leaker wants to be able to prove a future anonymous document will be leaked they should post the hashsums in the first document, so they can be verified as authenticate followups. For all we know, this is just /b/ having fun with the first leak pastebin.

This reads like some kid wrote it, not a Google employee.

It sounds exactly like a kid trying (and failing) to use fancy words to appear smarter. I don't believe it at all.

> I have communications. I have documents, I have files, I have lists, and I have names. I have all of it.

Then publish them you dimwit, and cease with the endless rhetoric.

This seems like some guy who's AdSense account got banned and now he's trying to take his revenge.

If there is any proof, just go to some good journalist, like Snowden did. The journalist will know how to proceed about publishing things for maximal media attention and impact on public opinion.

Part 1: http://pastebin.com/qh6Tta3h

Is there any impartial way to resolve the situation?

Last time matt cutts posted a comment calling the poster a fraud, the thread was flagged to hell, and it dissapeared from the front page.

What does Google need to do to prove itself innocent to the public?

I'm late to the party - where is part 1? Tldr?

This and the other "leak" are without question the dumbest thing I've ever read on HN. If the author had proof, they would have made that available. But it's obvious this person has nothing, and this person writes like a deranged and not very bright individual. For example saying "I have proof" is about as good as saying nothing. You don't demonstrate proof by declaring it, you demonstrate it by revealing it. I wouldn't be surprised if the author was actually schizophrenic.

This is steaming bullshit.

Surely anyone believing this is being influenced by bitterness about Adsense outcomes, or a desire to see a miss-step from Google's golden goose?

I'm flagging this story.

I've not seen the decline in comment quality that pg has talked about over the past few months, but this story seems to have attracted some of the worst. This is pure drama-seeking.

No idea if real or not. but this person would be pretty easy for google to uncover if he/she didn't mask his grammar. Wrote a huge corpus with fairly unique use of commas amongst other things.

It makes google sound almost Orwellian, which is not hard to believe considering how invasive their information gathering tentacles are and complete disregard for privacy of people.

Post was mostly likely made by someone making spammy and useless sites which was banned from Google Adsense and is now pissed that he has no more income.