The Hash Function Lounge
larc.usp.br
larc.usp.br
Be that as it may, I'm curious about the recommendation to use WHIRLPOOL. If anyone knows why this algorithm is supposed to be better than, let's say, SHA-512, I would appreciate an explanation. Is it because of some intrinsic strengh of the algorithm? Is it because one of the authors is Vincent Rijmen of AES fame? Is it because NESSIE is more trustworthy than NSA/NIST? Or is is simply because no one has found a way to break WHIRLPOOL yet?
Which is here really important since there was a lot of crypto community work on crypto hash functions since. All the really big work from there
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NIST_hash_function_competition
is missing from the title page. Unless you're interested in the history of crypto hashes, you shouldn't care too much about that page.
There are also other types of hash functions like pHash, simhash, etc.
I want to read it, but physically can't... My eyes aren't so good. I eventually just removed it with firefox dev tools but c'mon! That's not right.
Well it's ugly, but as long as the data is right it's fine with me.