No, those were two different people, @tnm and @Holman.
http://valleywag.gawker.com/ims-and-email-support-allegation...
> "That blog post has nothing to do with my job, the quality of my work, or what kind of coworker I was. People reading that should wonder why any of those things are relevant to me being harassed and HR sitting idly by. Would this happen to a man in the same situation? No."
Addressing the distraction: if a man said a woman reverted his code because he wouldn't sleep with her, and withheld they were in a relationship, then yes, that would be relevant and should be raised.
Unlike what ValleyWag claims though, that's not actually a denial.
In particular -- if she's going to level tacit, but just the same highly public and career-damaging accusations of sexual harassment or other misconduct against other GitHub employees -- which, going by the language of her recent j'accuse tweet ("Don't do business with ...") would pretty much have to be what she's implying (even though she won't say it directly)[1,2] -- then she had better be prepared to back up what she's saying with reality-based specifics.
Being as, going by her "uneven", to say the least, track record on veracity thus far, we just don't have much reason to give her the benefit of the doubt.
[1] https://twitter.com/nrrrdcore/status/459358875213238272 [2] also http://techcrunch.com/2014/04/24/horvath-names-names/, since deleted.