"I'll just email you instead"
But the real question is why we haven't simply dropped the 'e' altogether and differentiate it from the physical shipment of papers by calling the latter "postal mail" or "snail mail" or "paper mail" or something else reflecting its reduced status as a means of communication.
http://www.theverge.com/2013/10/23/5022332/the-new-york-time...
Worse (imo) was their long-time refusal to use the term "weblog" for such sites even though the inventors of the word, years before there were any articles about them, had always spelled it as one word, leading to such awkward copy as "a Web log, or 'blog'". The willingness to accept one neologism at face value ("blog") but not its ancestor ("weblog") reveals an unhealthy tendency to favor false logic ("we call it the World Wide Web, so it must be 'Web log'") over the actual history and usage of a word. Style guides should be about improving clarity, but changing the capitalization and adding a space to a new word is only going to cause confusion.
It hardly matters now that the original variant "weblog" is basically gone from actual usage, but I think it's a useful glimpse into the editors' mindset.
Just like I write "web", "blog", "electricity", and "debate".
(I do however capitalize "I". Because narcissism.)
It's also interesting to note that the Internet is a superclass -- it's a network of networks (you'll discover this if you dig into BGP and realize what ASNs represent). And for networks connected via TCP/IP and BGP, it's the superclass of all such networks and a universal.
If it were to fragment, or one or more independent networks were to emerge, or sufficiently off-planet networks would develop that couldn't directly participate in terrestrial Internet traffic, that's going to remain the case.