Rail on guard: Metro-North prepares for threat of rising sea levels
poughkeepsiejournal.com
poughkeepsiejournal.com
I really think climate change needs to be presented to the public as an economic problem. Our infrastructure is going to continue to get hammered, costing billions, and we're essentially subsidizing it.
Doesn't matter. If you don't think it's going to happen it doesn't matter what kind of problem it is...
(But, yes -- it's a remarkably difficult sell, as we've seen.)
The economic cost of natural disasters--NY, CA, and FL--is all related to RE development ("upscale") of unstable geography.
[1] Hudson Valley/Fairfield CT etc.
1: http://books.google.com/books/about/Ecology_of_fear.html?id=...
To me the bigger issue is wetland loss since flood walls will likely prevent the replacement of higher-elevation wetlands.
It's the nation's second largest when going by ridership (the number cited) to the LIRR with 334,000 passengers[0]. Both the LIRR and Metro-North are commuter rail systems for New York and are both MTA-owned/-operated, along with the subway, bus[1], etc.
The MTA is launching a $120 million project to "storm-proof" the Long Beach branch of the LIRR this year (among a myriad of other plans).[2]
[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_commuter_...
[1] Except out in the 'burbs, our buses got spun off and privatized somewhat recently
[2] http://www.thelirrtoday.com/2014/04/storm-proofing-long-beac...
#1 and #2 spots differences in ridership..? Is that a typo?
http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=resources/traffic&...
http://abcnews.go.com/US/north-carolina-bans-latest-science-...