Optimal Light Exposure for Rapidly Correcting Circadian Misalignment
ploscompbiol.org
ploscompbiol.org
Basically, for manipulating your circadian rhythm, light therapy is recommended as the first line of treatment (possibly supplemented with low-dose melatonin). The timing and intensity of light relative to when your internal clock thinks it is in the day determines the amount of slowing or lengthening of your cycle. So bright light during when your body thinks it is 'morning' will slow down the cycle, and bright light at 'night' will lengthen it. That's why many people use f.lux. But how much, how long?
Your cycle's natural free-running cycle length (without zeitgebers, or cues, to entrain it) appears to be determined by genetic factors. This is hard to measure without doing some tracking and, ideally, actually free-running. Pretty inconvenient.
This paper, which I look forward to reading in-depth, claims to have figured out optimal ways [took another look: general principles] of calculating the correct exposure and absence of light to allow for rapid recovery from jet lag. If true, it will probably make all light therapy much easier to do and calculate.
Care to share some references? It would be useful to add to the page above.
Nobody has a melatonin deficiency; you don't need melatonin levels to get restful sleep. If stress hormone levels are low you can fall asleep under bright lights with no melatonin.
I can't say taking 5mg every now and then would be harmful to humans, but when you understand melatonin's essential role as the winter hibernation hormone, and consider the animal experiments, I think you might want to prefer other means to get to sleep. Personally, I find diphenhydramine (benadryl) pretty good for occasional help nodding off. And that's very clearly safe for occasional use.
[0] http://www.lef.org/magazine/mag2013/sep2013_Melatonin-The-Br...
Either that or I somehow completely missed the table showing the effect of the schedule on subjects vs. controls, or any other sort of experimental confirmation whatsoever.
To be clear I don't object to the analysis or its methods, I object that it's not being clearly confessed to be an analysis in bold letters.
I've only spend 40 minutes reading the paper so far and only have a superficial understanding of it, but to me it looks like they are using a somewhat oscillator like model and looking to introduce a phase shift in the response by driving it with different input functions.
There is no experimental verification whatsoever. This is why this was in the computational biology section of plosone.
The next step, of course, is to actually try it out. It appears there's an iOS app based on this: http://entrain.math.lsa.umich.edu/
For that, I'd suggest getting some sun (or failing that, some light therapy lamp exposure—a special-purpose lamp that puts out a blinding amount of light) first thing when you wake up. Of course, you could optimize further too, like this paper suggests.
Source is admittedly Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed_sleep_phase_disorder#Ma..., and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PRC-Light%2BMel.png in particular.
When it happens I take a melatonin at night, and it seems to reset my sleep cycle and gives me a really good night's sleep. I don't normally take it more than once a week at most, just in case there are any negative effects. The delayed release tablets seem to work best (Jamieson, I believe it is), as they slowly release the melatonin over a period of 8 hours.
[1] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3983044/pdf/pcbi...