Eating Alone by Design: An Entire Restaurant With Tables for One
businessweek.com
businessweek.com
Still if you look around we are definitely the minority. It seems like some people can't stand the thought of eating alone. Sometimes co-workers will practically beg you to go eat lunch with them if they don't have anyone else to go with. I think people place a stigma on themselves about it even though they won't look twice when they see someone else out eating by themselves.
Wine and some literature or a notepad for creative flourishes are often better company than people... and can help one to take work and life less seriously. This is a situation in which strong service people can really make a restaurant shine. Also, often I find eating alone I am actually able to meet fellow diners, occasionally single and attractive ones, with relative ease!
Similarly, if feedback is requested by staff or I feel compelled to offer it at the end of the meal, I can be honest and open about my impressions and not have to curtail perspective to avoiding looking like a snob to my dining companions. (An aside, is that IMHO one mark of a great restaurant is one that invites and accepts graciously feedback from its patrons.)
France, Romania, and Los Angeles have the most single-dining friendly cultures I've encountered. Holland does have it but it can be a pain in the ass to find quality restaurants, and very hard to find anything done well that deviates from the European cuisine matrix. Much of Asia (Thailand, South India, China, etc.) has a great single dining culture from a more practical perspective: less white tablecloth, multi-course meals and wine lists - more convenient menus and hands down tasty single person optimized relatively-balanced meals, at least for a portion of their cuisine.
(Probably the best sushi bar meal I've had was when I had an 0600 flight out of SIN, and was saying at the old Changi Le Meridien; stayed up until 0100 at the sushi bar, split several bottles of soju with the chef, and had about SGD 400 in sushi and alcohol for what they billed as SGD 80. Omakase + alcohol = wonderful thing.)
I wonder if there are other cuisines (perhaps yet to be invented) which would work the same way. The market for dining alone is growing. The teppanyaki/benihana experience sort of works, but not so great alone.
going to a regular bar / gastropub works exactly the same way.
* it's a bar
* you can be there alone or with people
* you interact with the bartender
* he makes food and drink for you (or bar staff does)
* he drinks with you and bullshits with you
* he can discount your food and you tip him
* you develop a relationship if you go there often
you are assigning undue uniqueness to the sushi bar experience because it's not western cuisine. the actual interaction is not unique. there's also plenty of other cuisines in asia (outside of japan) that work the same way, i.e. street food, noodle bars, etc.
and i interact with my neighbors at the sushi bar all the time. so does everyone i know who likes sushi. especially when i'm drunk.
The world needs more places where people can just come together without pretense and maybe a common interest and mingle. I, for one, don't get into the club or bar scene, since I'm not a drinker and I'm bad at dancing; and not everyone is religious, so Church doesn't serve that purpose well, either
Not really. The bar gets money from you drinking, not from you talking. That's why they play the music so damn loud.
> I rarely go to bars with food
do you see how you're partitioning japanese things from non-japanese things in your mind, even though they are exactly the same thing?
The enjoyment you may get out of talking to a sushi chef or similar is this mutual respect that if the chef wants to talk to you about software, you are the professional and you've spent your life perfecting it. When you speak to a sushi chef, you expect the same level of competence to go into his food. In other countries often when you go out to eat you don't even know the name of the restaurant, or even care... When you make plans to go there you reference the restaurant by the name of the chef that works there. "Hey, I heard Chef Baca is working at Roberta's Pizza Joint, we should go". When you go to a sushi bar, you expect the chef to give you your sushi exactly how it's meant to be eaten. You dont ask for a side of ranch, or ketchup, which is kind of like walking into an art gallery and asking the artist if he can add some more red brush strokes to his painting because you really prefer it that way.
As an artist, or a chef, I would kindly ask you to leave and take your bowl of ketchup on the side with you.
If a chef tells me to leave because I'm putting ketchup on something, though, I'm likely to hit him with the bottle.
>Americans seem to prefer to put a blindfold on and act like animals arent killed for food
I am at a loss on how you possibly come to that conclusion about a country that, aside from Canada, has more hunters per capita than any other Western nation.
I think as a culture we socialize too much around food. People meet, date, celebrate, have family get-togethers around lunches and dinners. I think we need a cultural shift where we socialize around doing something together.
This just looks silly.
Sports bar where every booth gives good access to a TV
Clean finger foods and a massive desk so you can get work done
A place that promotes eating while reading with comfy chairs and a quiet atmosphere
But none of them seemed to be applicable to this design. Their food better be phenomenal, because I can't think of any other reason to go to a place like this.For me, the prototypical "one-person" restaurants are Japanese noodle bars though, where most people sit at the counter and eat by themselves. In general, Japan seems to have embraced this idea of catering to a generation of singles much earlier than the rest of the world, probably due to their high number of single households and low birth rate. Considering the declining birth rates throughout the world this kind of business will become more relevant other countries, too.
where did you get that statistic from?
Even in high-fertility countries, it's been dropping from 5 to more like 2-3, largely correlated with female education and opportunities other than (early, exclusive) motherhood.
(The US would have a negative growth rate if it weren't for immigration, largely from Spanish-speaking nations in the Western hemisphere.)
Population of the earth as a whole is still increasing, but that's largely due to a few parts of the world which have had huge birthrates in the past and a large population under-30 (and under-18, so it will continue for a while.). It's a mean vs. median problem.
As you say, population of the earth as a whole is still increasing, and the birth rate is not in decline.
It's not a mean vs. median problem at all.
If it were in decline we wouldn't be facing one of the biggest global issues of over population.
Population'' is clearly negative -- the global birth rate IS in decline, and has been since 1950 according to the UN (I don't see earlier stats). Population is still increasing because Population' is positive. (well, actually Birth rate > death rate).
Per country, it actually is a median vs. mean problem; most countries (hence, median) have below-replacement birth rates; there are a limited number of countries with substantially above replacement birth rates, due to both fertility and the demographic composition (lots of young people).
No, its not. For several reasons. Firstly, because the derivative of population is the rate of population growth (persons/unit time) which is not just the rate of births per unit time, but births minus deaths. Secondly, because "birth rate" isn't the rate of births per unit time, but the rate of births per unit time per unit population.
> Population'' -- the global birth rate IS in decline, and has been since 1950 according to the UN
Those statements are only distantly related and only the latter is clearly true. While the birth rate (births/person/year) has been dropping for quite a long time, the second derivative of population with respect to time was around 0 from the late 1980s to recently, with the first derivative hovering at around 1 gigaperson / 12 years, though projections are that that rate of increase is slowing somewhat now. The second derivative of population with respect to time was actually positive for most of the 20th century, with each successive billion people added in a shorter period of time until it leveled off around at the 12 years / billion level. [1]
Use the slider to move the time axis. Birth rates have declined in most of the world during the last 100 years, with a strong inverse correlation between life expectancy / wealth and birth rate. The US still withstands this trend somewhat with a birth rate just above 2.0, whereas most European countries range between 1.3 - 1.7 births / woman (which is not enough to sustain population).
This Wikipedia article is also interesting:
There are also night market food stands which are popular in Taiwan and overseas Chinese communities.
Doing a bit of discreet people watching is always interesting (to me at least) and it was even better being in a foreign country where you can see the differences between your own culture and theirs.
I did feel a bit embarrassed at first but once you sit down and order what you like its fine. No one pays you any attention at all.
Also, that site is a bloated hog.
I like eating alone since always, because I like to be kept to my own to think. I need some time alone, only and usually my ipod. It is just a particular need, not a character trait that make me superior, cool, interesting, etc.
I understand why a company (or a industry) would want to make some kind of consumism look like a status indicator - I surely understand why that particular restaurant would want that. But why some journalists also are always trying to dictate where status come from?