Tennessee begins free community college plan
tennessean.com
tennessean.com
It would be hard to quantify the return on investment to the taxpayers, but free quality higher education must have contributed to the thriving California economy and culture.
I collected some numbers on that a few years ago: http://www.kmjn.org/misc/uc_funding.txt. That table shows total and per-student support; the latter is partly impacted by the growth in student numbers. But if you convert the numbers for each year to percent of state GDP, or support per resident, there's a large decline in those terms as well (in GDP terms, from roughly 0.3% to 0.1%).
Interestingly there's no real correlation between partisan politics and the numbers. Funding was generally high under both Republican and Democratic administrations in earlier years, and has been cut under both administrations in more recent years. My guess is that as a "discretionary" line in the budget the UC is just relatively easy to chop, when someone making up a budget needs to close some holes, so it ended up bearing the brunt of the recent budget crisis that was caused by other parts of the budget.
More like, it came down to cutting education, cutting pensions, or cutting healthcare spending. This is a problem across the entire country, but California has more generous pension and healthcare promises, so the problem is especially acute there.
When my province came out of what we call the Révolution tranquille (Quiet Revolution), we had one of the lowest postsecondary education population rate in Canada. By creating a bunch of public universities with extremely low tuition fee, we have a whole different picture 40 years later with a well educated population.
Without assuming too much, I'm not certain when you went to school, based on those numbers it seems a while ago.
2013-2014, average in-state tuition for 4-year public universities is just over 5,000 per semester, and that DOESN'T include housing, meals, books and other incidentals - it assumes you only pay for classes, nothing else.
Wyoming was the lowest average in 2013-14, at $4,404 for the year (2202 per semester), and under $9,000 when you include housing and meal plan - not bad, really.
Anymore, even with Pell, state grants and federal subsidized loans, students still have to come up with 1,000-3,000 per semester. So, that's where the unsubsidized and parent plus loans come in.
Source - my own institutional research at a community college for the last two years.
For comparison, U of T in Ontario comes to around $6,000 p.a., or $13,000 for Engineering.
For example, land grant colleges were set up so that farming profits paid for the next generation's education. We've largely replaced that with student-loan debt based education, which sets graduates back for years or even decades. Now we have a stagnant economy where most people are struggling to get by instead of making meaningful contributions that increase their wealth and ability to pay/donate down the road. The founding fathers knew why public education was so important, yet at every turn we see people constantly attempting to privatize and marginalize it. It frankly disgusts me, which I know I’m not supposed to say on HN, but there it is.
I'd be curious to hear some creative solutions to that problem.
Almost all of my comp sci courses were at night because the students worked and so did the professors. Our professors were DoD Ada/C programmers at Vandenberg Air Force Base (which was quite awesome having professors with real-world experience).
Community college is a great option for working adults. That's why they have so many night classes (and now online classes). In California it's not free but it's extremely affordable and there are plenty of grants available. Like a University, there are also plenty of on-campus jobs that can work around your schedule (I ended up with a campus job that was funded by a grant and paid 3x minimum wage).
There's also plenty of vocational options as well–the nursing programs at the CCs near me are often impacted because people are getting jobs as soon as they graduate.
My point is, I don't really agree with your premise (granted, the system isn't perfect). If you work full-time, you might not be able to transfer or graduate in exactly 2 years but you can definitely do it.
I did this for over a year and it was definitely rough. I think that's why so few people leave community college for universities. Work and bills and responsibilities stack up and school is usually the easiest one to cut out to make room for others. No one can stop working lest they will not have a place to live or food to eat.
It is very unfortunate because the people that would benefit most from the education end up dropping out while those with family support can push through because they're working less, have financial support, and can afford to take classes over again.
I can't think of an easy solution to this other than offering a stipend for lower income students. Free classes will definitely help though, I think this is fantastic.
The program is pretty new, so I am not sure there is much data yet.
Of course legal rules and social rules are different, but I don't see a big media backlash against companies for failing to hire smart 18-year-olds.
I don't agree that a significant amount of low income people who can't afford college are having that financial problem because they live excessively beyond their means. I also suspect the reason a lot of lower income people are working full time jobs is just as much for health insurance as the actual paychecks.
What if University was free _AND_ health care & small apartments were supplied for those(and family) who qualify for excessive hardship and maintain high GPA?
Anything to raise the average education level of the population I think is a win, even if it has to come from the higher-income taxpayers... as long as data shows that indeed significantly more people end up with degrees.
That said, I think we would probably be well served by providing free high-school level education for anyone that needs it. AKA any-class available to high school students should have free adult equivalent.
Both should be free (or heavily subsidized), but like in healthcare, we should be paying for outcomes, not services rendered. And we should open things up to allow economies of scale.
At the risk of sounding callous, starting a family before you can afford it is living beyond your means.
> Anything to raise the average education level of the population I think is a win
I presume you don't support full-time college (and room and board and healthcare) for anyone on demand. Barring that, we're just discussing funding levels, criteria for eligibility, and metrics for success.
"Nationally" accredited is scam school code for "not accredited."
Some details: http://www.su.dk/English/Sider/agency.aspx
For reference, it appears Denmark has about 230,000 enrolled college students.
[1] Somewhat outdated figures, but I believe still roughly accurate: http://www.sustyrelsen.dk/udst/in_english/cost_of_study/kap4...
http://money.cnn.com/2013/10/16/news/economy/shutdown-econom...
$24bn is the estimated cost (to the economy as a whole, rather than the government as a specific billed item) of the totally unnecessary government shutdown last year. It is literally the amount of money Congress can waste without thinking, or while trying very hard to avoid thinking.
E.g. go to community college, learn a particular skill set, join a company, and that company pays your loans in the event some set of conditions are met (2 years successful employment at the company afterward, GPA minimum, etc.)
Technically he could quit and pay back the Navy, but they've been paying him so poorly that doing so would plunge him into debt.
Furthermore, it is not obvious to me that the government has a use for all the the graduates of all the majors anyway; maybe the State of Tennessee could use a few hundred developers to work on sites and services that are provided/run by the state, but could they find work for all the CS graduates that universities in Tennessee can pump out? Society will value those peoples' skills, so their degrees are not worthless in any meaningful respect, but governments only need so many people in that profession. Maybe you could still hire them and have them do busywork, but that would just be an unnecessary waste of resources that would leave a bad gap in those people's resumes.
In aggregate, maybe. In every case? Certainly not. Spending six figures for someone to get a Ph.d. in Esperanto doesn't seem beneficial to society to me.
I sincerely hope these colleges are providing quality courses and lesson plans. This could be a major win for the state's workforce/ future hiring for our company here.
I also think this is a great outlet for TN lottery money - but I very much hope can trickle more into early education as well to provide much better starts for young kids around the state. Its much easier to start strong than catch up later (cough, Memphis/ Shelby County, allow casinos downtown and use money for elementary education, please).