Ironically the post reads extremely sexist. "We're offended by due process! Ahhhh the female lost; must be sexism!". I'm not arguing Github hasn't handled this situation as well as possible, but really?
And the counterproductive, zero-sum game that modern gender advocates get wrapped up in playing - that is a cause of it.
Did we read the same blog post [0]? While I agree that we might have seen a little more from GitHub than we would have from MS/Google their response to the situation was extremely lacking IMHO.
[0] https://github.com/blog/1823-results-of-the-github-investiga...
What other steps would you suggest they have taken that would have constituted a satisfactory response?
Did she? The offending member quit, so it isn't really a loss.
> I'm not arguing Github hasn't handled this situation as well as possible, but really?
The discussion afterwards brought up that many of the witnesses external of GitHub were not contacted, which if true shows that their selection of external auditing used a biased basis to prove no harm was done.
It doesn't matter if I believe.
All I am saying is that the posters could have seen that evidence and used it as their basis.
You can't tell a company that already investigated a problem to investigate it again, it would be fruitless. Cutting ties is basically your only choice.
> favoring the assumption of wrongdoing rather then a discussion or argument against Github's reasoning/investigation.
I repeat my last point. They can't ask Github to investigate something they investigated. It cannot create different results.
The problems pointed out are systematic, it isn't like repeating the process will magically remove those problems and find a different result.
Why would you love to hear my argument against Github here?? I never said I was for or against them. I simply said that your assertion that due process had happened is untrue.