What you’d need to make in every county in the US to afford a decent one-bedroom
washingtonpost.com
washingtonpost.com
Speaking of minimum wages, what's up with the five Washington and 3 Oregon counties with minimum wages above the "what you's need to make" mark?
Columbia County Pend Oreille County Stevens County Wahkiakum County Lincoln County Harney County Morrow County Wheeler County
Agreed, but I'm not sure that makes it a bad chart. To me, one of the things the chart is saying is that 1BDR housing wages outside of the $10-13 range are uninteresting.
If this is something they checked and know to be true, then deliberately zooming in on that range is useful, because it highlights that variance. If they're hiding relevant information by ignoring things outside of that range, then it's a problem.
I mean, it's a choropleth. That already starts edging into "bad chart" territory.
Here it is, for anyone interested: https://www.dropbox.com/s/40bg2um044vy82f/2014-OOR-ALL.xls
Namely, the PDF indicates 2-bedroom whereas the WaPo article indicates 1-bedroom. I should probably do a number-comparison on a per-county basis to see if the WaPo writers simply made a mistake, but I'm feeling pretty lazy.
Two bedrooms are always surprisingly close in price to one bedrooms.
But yes. dm2 is correct. This is probably the link that should have been shared to start: http://nlihc.org/oor/2014
My friends who aren't involved in the tech industry have quite a long row to hoe when it comes to making more money. I had a friend (who loves cooking and is accomplished in restaurant work) struggle to find anything above $13-15 an hour in NYC (and that's hard work at a busy restaurant), and it doesn't often get better than that.
For some, living in below average accommodations isn't a necessary stop along the way but the destination, and that stinks.
First, as long as money has any meaning, people with more of it are going to live better than people with less of it. Maybe it would be more fair if all young people lived below average and all older people lived above average, but it's a huge reconstruction of society.
Second, NYC is the fifth most expensive city in the world[1]. I presume your friend is there because he's getting something besides money for his work -- adulation of customers, or a chance to make it really big.
Or, it's a deliberate consumption choice. He wants to live in walking distance of Broadway and great restaurants. Well, that's a choice in how he spends his money. I could live in a mansion in my city and complain about how expensive it is, but I shouldn't expect any sympathy because I choose to live someplace expensive. I could deliberately have 8 kids and then complain about how much times my kids require, or I could be a Olympic gymnast and complain about how much training I have to do, or I could keep a cluster of 40 PCs in my living room to play 40 simultaneous WoW games and then complain about how much it all costs.
There's nothing magical about consumption choices because they go into "housing" versus "free time" or "computers" or "nights at the opera." If someone was renting the most expensive cars in the US and complaining about how he can't afford something, the answer would be very similar to another person who was renting the most expensive real estate in the US.
Living on top of Mount Everest is expensive, even if you were born there.
[1] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/property/internationalproperty/10... NYC is the most expensive in the US. Of course rankings change over time.
The first situation is more scary than the second, of course. Being young and single and in good health with no kids it was fine living below average.
According to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the 1-bedroom rent+utilities cost (or FMR) is $750 for Schenectady County, NY. [1]
At minimum wage, and 40 hours each week, you make $7.25404 = $1160 each month.
How is $1160 < $750?
[1]: http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/fmr/fmrs/FY2014_code/...
[1] http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/special-topics/files/...
so food, transport, clothes, cleaning supplies, laundromat, insurance etc. would have to fit into ~200 a month.
Also, many places won't let you rent without meeting the 30% of income amount.
It is an important point that would provide context to a lot of numbers.
"The signature finding of Out of Reach is the annual Housing Wage - the hourly wage a full-time worker must earn to afford a decent two-bedroom rental home at HUD-estimated Fair Market Rent (FMR) while spending no more than 30% of income on housing costs."
It is not at all obvious. I really wish that news articles like this would set aside a section where they explicitly name and link to their sources rather than burying them as hyperlinks in the text.
Pardon the expression.
Deleted comment
I looked at the title and wondered why you would want the sum total of all the housing costs. I would rather know what each county's costs are. Clicking on the link it is each, however given the prestige of the website made me wonder if this is another subtle example of British verses American usage?
The rich live in cities, and landlords set rents according to the ability to pay.