Weebly Valued at $455M Amid Website-Building Boom
blogs.wsj.com
blogs.wsj.com
http://purplehazetheme.weebly.com/ http://collectiontheme.weebly.com/
We salt and hash all passwords using a variable-cost bcrypt implementation.
But the solution I've favored is hashing the user's password on the client with a hash that provides enough significant bits that your key derivation on the server is not weakened. This way you get the benefit of not needing to deal with differences in transmission size and the user's plaintext password is never exposed to any listener (regardless of whether the connection is secure, or believed to be secure).
Went to sign up but sign up page was on a non SSL page. I don't like sending passwords in the clear.
The app itself is very nice.
I tried your feature request voting website but it didn't seem like my suggestions showed up at all after submitting them.
There are plenty of people using Weebly for personal projects or educational purposes (teachers, professors, students), but our core focus is entrepreneurs.
[1]http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2011/08/...
Here are a few example sites:
I don't want to be in the web site or CMS business. I've sufficient metadata from my application to export enough information to generate a single page website for these clients. How can I send them your way?
Would love to add some buttons to page and what not.
1. It's monolingual.
2. It's mono-currency.
3. It has a hidden schedule of fees like ripoff domain name registration with unwanted extra features, support for requisite features like SSL support (duh!) and shipping calculations.
4. It's not clear for which jurisdictions/product types you support tax calculations, or whether multi-party split revenue models are supported (eg. for dropship scenarios, digital product retailing eg. online content). Dynamic pricing also looks like it's not supported .. common digital retailing operations might use this, eg. for Hollywood content.
5. It's unclear to me based in China whether or not I can receive payments through your system.
6. It has no support for communities (eg. hosted forums) which despite not being Web2.0 are actually pretty cool for building customers for ecommerce operations.
7. The actual build bit seems almost completely disconnected from the plan bit, which mostly talks in gross generalities about the build bit without making you do it. The link between the two could be improved.
8. Dogecoin support?
Congrats on getting rich.
I'd love to know what's your take on third party integrations with Weebly - are you guys working on an App Store or this is only doable through partnerships? If only partnerships, what's the best way reach out?
We're a platform offering customisable widgets, currently rebranding as Widgetic. I played with some widgets here: http://vuzum.weebly.com. Oana Calugar (at Weebly) has reached out to us a while ago and I agree with her, we do fit as a glove. :-)
Or maybe that just isn't a concern because so far nothing like that exists?
I like the idea of Weebly, I think building web software should be based on components for the programmers and usability for users. But I don't see how a closed platform stays relevant.
I think its just that most web developers still don't understand widgets.
Marc Andreessen's aggressive stance is that the dot.com bubble was basically a "mistake". If that's correct, how would one decide that an "old" idea's time has come?
http://blogs.wsj.com/venturecapital/2012/11/01/marc-andreess...
“All the dot-com ideas were correct,” he said. “They were all too early. They are happening now.”
The article's title is clickbait.
Thanks Weebly!
The real test of the service will be sites that require constant changing (due to SEO rewards for timely updates as much as upgrades or general content management). When I hear "probably persist almost unchanged for months" I assume you are not in a position to benefit from marketing communication.
I didn't necessarily "get it" at first, but after 2 years of watching startups of my batch mates and friends succeed or fail, I see any focus on press as a negative signal.
A good team builds a good product. A good product begets success. Success begets news coverage. These things don't work in reverse.
And Weebly is a great product. A few years ago after coding a web app for a non-profit, I considered building a service to do that for small orgs. But then I chanced upon 1 year old weebly, and was like never mind.
Anyway, congrats, and hope to see even more!
It's something the guys at 37Signals preach as well - Better to be a "lifestyle business" that's profitable, makes millions of dollars in profit per year, and may take a decade or two to reach a $1 billion valuation, than to have a multi-billion dollar valuation a few years in (via large growth funding rounds) but not make a cent of profit for the first decade of your existence, all the while having your ownership of the business reduced down to 5% or whatever.
I'm curious their main sources of customer acquisition. I assume a lot of its word-of-mouth and organic, but I'm curious how much marketing they do. Squarespace has been huge in the podcast space doing advertising and did that big Super Bowl ad splash. Wix seems to have been around for a while so I see many of their out-dated designed sites.
Edit: I did just get retargeted via Facebook ads exchange after visiting Weebly's site, so they are doing at least some advertising :)
Haven't checked out Weebly yet but I hope they took a "standards approach" to their sites/code and allow for proper redirects.
Update: Very pleased to see this: http://kb.weebly.com/301-redirects.html
Wix and Squarespace at least are spending a ton on PPC customer acquisition. One analysis we saw put their AdWords spend at $10-25K per day (though, I'm not sure how accurate that is).
Also, both Wix and Squarespace advertise on terrestrial radio and television. Squarespace had a Super Bowl ad and I regularly see their ads on Shark Tank (ABC). I hear Wix ads quite often on AM radio.
Squarespace was on Inc's 5000 list in 2011 with 2010 revenues of 11.7M.
Wix went public recently. They had 2012 revenues of $43.68M with a loss of $15M [1].
In the "general purpose business website" space, I think all 3 (Wix, SS, Weebly) see it as a "winner take all / own the market" play (it probably is). So, they are all spending as much as possible to acquire customers.
Wix clearly isn't profitable. I doubt SqaureSpace is. I think it's admirable that Weebly is ... but I almost wonder if they need to spend more to compete.
Almost 300 employees, spending a ton on ad/marketing, and raising that much money–I can't see how they're profitable. I could be way wrong though.
[1] http://blogs.wsj.com/venturecapital/2014/04/15/squarespace-r...
With all the caveats about average numbers, it seems that on average each site is visited by only 8 visitors per month. Are those numbers correct?
It is very likely that the number of visits follow a similar power-law distribution.
Instead a website needs structured sections (such as navigation, logo, footer etc.) as well as "blank canvas" areas (such as the body of the content).
They always seem to nail this tension.
Congratulations to David and Weebly- they consistently ship amazing features!
PS - My background: I've written in-depth reviews of 40+ website builders.
I sometimes do pro bono websites for local businesses I run into. I used to do Google AppEngine sites, but then I switched to Weebly for the last one I did (for my daycare lady). It was super-easy both for me to set up, and then when I handed it off to her, she was able to edit it and make it really what she wanted. Between a Weebly site, and getting the existing customers to leave Yelp reviews, she ended up getting a lot of new kids from the online presence.
Getting a basic website up is simple. To contrast I tried other website builders and weebly was the most functional and intuitive for me.
Great job David and team!
I think weebly offered this service themselves a few years ago but now I can't seem to find the option.
This statement only applies to the founders, employees, and customers of the company. My point is that it doesn't apply to the investors: from an investor perspective, it doesn't matter if almost every company dies as long as the Droboxes and Airbnbs survive and grow. Almost all the returns come from a tiny number of outrageous successes, to the point where even a big hit like Weebly is a drop in the bucket.